On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie <pierre.labas...@neuf.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA > lately.
I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it. > ICA is broken because of the part in glibc's instructions, which > instructs 'test-installation.pl' to look for /usr/lib rather than > /tools/lib. On the second (and following) pass, the line 'DL=...' sets > DL to empty (because /tools has been removed). Then the sed creates > a flawed 'test-installation.pl'. > > Here is a patch which could be applied inside the LFS subdirectory > of jhalfs: Thanks, I'll apply that this evening. > Let me know if my efforts on jhalfs may be useful. It seems that > my post on jhalfs-discuss has reached nobody... Besides adding > package management, which you can simply disable by setting > package management to n (this is the default) in the config menu, > I spotted a few other bugs in the handling of tests. For example, > look for the line "ulimits..." before tests in gcc, in the scripts > from current jhalfs. I monitor alfs-discuss too, but have no interest in package management hence made no comment on it :-) I guess if the patch doesn't break things for none-package-management uses then it could be applied with a minimum of discussion really. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
