Re: problem with groff 1.21

2011-01-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42:59AM +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote: > Ken Moffat schrieb: > >> > > I had no problems with either libX11-1.4.0 or libXaw-1.0.8 (one > > complete build with xorg-7.6 and gnome-2.30, one partial build with > > xorg-7.6 on a different machine). > > i had not the same versio

Re: Kernel and glibc headers

2011-01-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
William Immendorf wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Yes. The kernel headers include definitions for the kernel only. Don't >> use the kernel headers for applications or utilities. > Unless you want to use the kernel for direct hardware access or > graphics acclerat

Re: problem with groff 1.21

2011-01-11 Thread Tobias Gasser
Ken Moffat schrieb: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote: >> next occurence is libXaw, widgets.ps in specs >> > I had no problems with either libX11-1.4.0 or libXaw-1.0.8 (one > complete build with xorg-7.6 and gnome-2.30, one partial build with > xorg-7.6 on a different

Re: Kernel and glibc headers

2011-01-11 Thread William Immendorf
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Yes.  The kernel headers include definitions for the kernel only.  Don't > use the kernel headers for applications or utilities. Unless you want to use the kernel for direct hardware access or graphics accleration. -- William Immendorf The

Re: Kernel and glibc headers

2011-01-11 Thread Sebastian Plotz
Ok, thank you! Best regards Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 14:35 -0600 schrieb Bruce Dubbs: > Yes. The kernel headers include definitions for the kernel only. Don't > use the kernel headers for applications or utilities. > >-- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-de

Re: Kernel and glibc headers

2011-01-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Sebastian Plotz wrote: > Is there a difference between using the header files from the kernel > (for example /usr/include/linux/inotify.h) or the header files from > glibc (/usr/include/sys/inotify.h)? Yes. The kernel headers include definitions for the kernel only. Don't use the kernel header

Kernel and glibc headers

2011-01-11 Thread Sebastian Plotz
Hello, this doesn't directly belongs to LFS but maybe somebody can answer my question. Is there a difference between using the header files from the kernel (for example /usr/include/linux/inotify.h) or the header files from glibc (/usr/include/sys/inotify.h)? Sebastian -- http://linuxfromscra

Re: problem with groff 1.21

2011-01-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote: > > next occurence is libXaw, widgets.ps in specs > I had no problems with either libX11-1.4.0 or libXaw-1.0.8 (one complete build with xorg-7.6 and gnome-2.30, one partial build with xorg-7.6 on a different machine). I'm a bit sur

problem with groff 1.21

2011-01-11 Thread Tobias Gasser
next occurence is libXaw, widgets.ps in specs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

problem with groff 1.21

2011-01-11 Thread Tobias Gasser
compiling libX11-1.3.4 fails with groff 1.21, with groff 1.20.1 everything's fine. the problem occurs in specs/libX11 and specs/XIM (but not with specs/i18n) when building the .ps files. the error is "table wider than line width" as the error does not occur when removing .ps from the makefile or