Ken Moffat schrieb:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>> next occurence is libXaw, widgets.ps in specs
>>
>  I had no problems with either libX11-1.4.0 or libXaw-1.0.8 (one
> complete build with xorg-7.6 and gnome-2.30, one partial build with
> xorg-7.6 on a different machine).

i had not the same versions as you are useing...
i'm stil at xorg 7.5, thus libX11-1.3.4 and libXaw-1.0.7

> 
>  I'm a bit surprised that a postscript file comes into play during
> your build of xorg - on a fresh system, LFS builds groff without its
> optional dependencies (of which one is gs, and X - including libX11 -
> is another), and BLFS has xorg as a dependency of gs (because of how
> the test to see if the tiger is rendered).  Therefore, groff when
> built in LFS has had limited functionality since at least 1.20.1 (I
> didn't bother checking groff logs for versions older than that).
> 

gs is not built yet, i will build it after xorg and xfce is finished, i
don't know why groff 1.21 is capable to build the ps files, with 1.20.1
i have no problems and the .ps are not build.

xorg is completed now, i have no more failures. thus just the 2
mentionned packages fail building ps files.

i can't find any more .ps files except the ones from libX11 specs/i18n
(LocaleDB.ps Framework.ps and Trans.ps) which are built with success.
but with groff 1.20.1 those files are not built, thus your question why
configure now assumes to be able to build ps-files is quite a good question!

i just downloaded your versions for libX11 and libXaw and both compile
fine without building any .ps files.

BUT:
libXaw-1.0.7 built the files doc/widgets.{html,ps,txt} where as 1.0.8
has none of them but a bunch of .xml files!
with libX11-1.3.4 in doc/xtrans/specs the {html,ps,txt,images/*png}
files now are substitued by another bunch of xml and svg files!!

i can't say groff won't build ps-files. obviously the people at xorg
changed the docs from ps/html/txt to xml, thus groff won't fail any
longer. but why with groff 1.20.1 no .ps files are built, and with 1.21
despite the missing ghostscript make tries to build them (or configure
assumes to be able to build them) is beyond my knowledge...



i just rebuilt the 2 packages after finishing xorg and now start a
complete rebuild to check wether these 2 are compatible with xorg 7.5...


thanks for your help

btw: sorry for my bad english, but here it's now 0:40 in the moring, i'm
a little tired - time to go to bed and let the computer do his work...

tobias
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to