Kevin Buckley wrote:
>>> The suggestion above is that gettext only needs it for Glade
>>> support.
>> That's true. So far, only Glade support in gettext requires an XML
>> parser.
>
> I think that's the key for me. It seems as though it is only
> Glade-related input to gettext which requires XML
> > The suggestion above is that gettext only needs it for Glade support.
>
> That's true. So far, only Glade support in gettext requires an XML parser.
I think that's the key for me. It seems as though it is only Glade-related
input to gettext which requires XML parsing and not anything from oth
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:50:53 +1200, Kevin Buckley
> wrote:
>
>> Does an LFS system really need XML parsing, from expat or
>> libxml2, as a feature?
>>
>> The suggestion above is that gettext only needs it for Glade support.
>
> That's true. So far, only Glade support i
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On 24/05/10 07:50, Kevin Buckley wrote:
>> I have little issue with repeating an install of an LFS package within
>> BLFS when/if one goes "Beyond" the facilities that LFS really requires
>> of a given package.
>>
>> I am sure that that approach was the LFS vogue at one point
On 24/05/10 07:50, Kevin Buckley wrote:
> I have little issue with repeating an install of an LFS package within
> BLFS when/if one goes "Beyond" the facilities that LFS really requires
> of a given package.
>
> I am sure that that approach was the LFS vogue at one point and
> was trying to think o
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:50:53 +1200, Kevin Buckley
wrote:
> Does an LFS system really need XML parsing, from expat or
> libxml2, as a feature?
>
> The suggestion above is that gettext only needs it for Glade support.
That's true. So far, only Glade support in gettext requires an XML parser.
