Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Nathan Coulson schrieb:
>
>> I have been experimenting with a multilib LFS System (where /lib,
>> /usr/lib are used for 64bit, and /lib/32, and /usr/lib/32 are used
>> for 32bit). I wanted something as close to LFS as possible,
>> primarily 64bit, but just enough 32bit so
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:18:16 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
>>> wrote:
>>>
#2033 Create initramfs
I think this one should be closed as won't fix. The reason for a
initrd is for those systems that don't know in a
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0600, Matthew Burgess
> wrote:
>
>> stty: standard input: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
> OK, figured this out to be the section of /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
> that sets the COLUMNS variable by calling 'stty' (obvious now!). So,
> why c
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0600, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> stty: standard input: Inappropriate ioctl for device
OK, figured this out to be the section of /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions that sets
the
COLUMNS variable by calling 'stty' (obvious now!). So, why can't it set that
then? Am I
missing
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:35:47 -0700, Bryan Kadzban
wrote:
> The kernel has *no* idea what your local time zone is, so it can't work
> with an RTC in local-time (I'm pretty sure the kernel help message for
> the last option says something to this effect). It always assumes the
> RTC is in UTC whe
2009/9/18 Tobias Gasser :
[ snip good explanations ]
> what about the kernel modules. they will be 64 bit, don't they have to
> be in /lib64/modules?
Tried it in clfs. Not worth the aggro. You have to change the top-level
kernel Makefile every time.
> perl: most will be in /lib/perl as they
2009/9/18 Nathan Coulson :
.
>
> I have been experimenting with a multilib LFS System (where /lib,
> /usr/lib are used for 64bit, and /lib/32, and /usr/lib/32 are used for
> 32bit). I wanted something as close to LFS as possible, primarily
> 64bit, but just enough 32bit so if I wanted to compile s
Nathan Coulson schrieb:
>
> I have been experimenting with a multilib LFS System (where /lib,
> /usr/lib are used for 64bit, and /lib/32, and /usr/lib/32 are used for
> 32bit). I wanted something as close to LFS as possible, primarily
> 64bit, but just enough 32bit so if I wanted to compile some
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:18:16 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>>> #2033Create initramfs
>>>
>>> I think this one should be closed as won't fix. The reason for a
>>> initrd is for those systems that don't know in advance which
>>> drivers are
