Re: Package management

2008-12-08 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Gordon Schumacher wrote: > Gordon Schumacher wrote: >> I think I have an even better idea: rather than putting *any* >> package management commands in, what about something like this: >> >> If you would like to generate binary packages, you will need >> to define a function that will be used to ge

Download glibc

2008-12-08 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi, A French user who used the book 6.4 noted that the link to download glibc is out. The tarball seems to be here: ftp://mirror.cict.fr/lfs/lfs-packages/development/glibc-2.8-20080929.tar.bz2 I don't know what you want to do with this piece of information but at least it's given. Regards,

kbd-1.15 backspace patch

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi all, Just wondering whether anyone has attempted to send our kbd backspace patch upstream yet? The header suggests we haven't, but I'm not sure how accurate that is. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe:

Package management (was: Aiming for 7.0)

2008-12-08 Thread Gordon Schumacher
Gordon Schumacher wrote: > I think I have an even better idea: rather than putting *any* package > management commands in, what about something like this: > > If you would like to generate binary packages, you will need to > define a function that will be used to generate those packages. Run a > c