Greg Schafer wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> We can simplify the sed expression and get rid of the note entirely if we
>> change it to:
>>
>> -e 's@/tools@@g'
>>
>> Anyone have any objections to this change?
>
> I'd just like to make the following points:
>
> 1. You're introducing a di
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> We can simplify the sed expression and get rid of the note entirely if we
> change it to:
>
> -e 's@/tools@@g'
>
> Anyone have any objections to this change?
I'd just like to make the following points:
1. You're introducing a distinct lack of clarity about what is
In section 6.10, Readjusting the Toolchain we perform about 3 sed
expressions to specs file. The first one looks like this:
-e 's@/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Also, there is a prominent note before this sed command stating:
"If working on a platform where the name of th
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:01:45AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> One commenter said that virtually everything except flash and grub
> were 64 bit. I believe that flash is a very important application for
> many users and until that becomes available, many users will reject
> 64-bit Linux.
>
Gn
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:01:45AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> One commenter said that virtually everything except flash and grub
> were 64 bit. I believe that flash is a very important application for
> many users and until that becomes available, many users will reject
> 64-bit Linux.
That is
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:34:19PM +, I wrote:
>
> I can do esound, flac (patch), id3lib (patch), lame, libdvdcss,
> SDL, mpg123, xine-lib, audacious (plugins now require neon, at least
> at runtime, we have it as a link from subversion). I'll be happy to
> add libtheora, but I think fixing
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: The value of 64-bit vs 32-bit
...
> The only consideration, to my mind, would then be: should LFS worry
> about providing multilib supp
Am Freitag, 28. November 2008 05:05:37 schrieb Dennis J Perkins:
> > The only consideration, to my mind, would then be: should LFS worry
> > about providing multilib support or not?
> >
> > --
> > JH
>
> How many programs don't run in 64-bit mode now? I'm running 64-bit LFS
> and the only ones I c
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: The value of 64-bit vs 32-bit
...
> > * Any comments on the details provided in the above article,
> > specifically in how that might relat
