Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > We can simplify the sed expression and get rid of the note entirely if we > change it to: > > -e 's@/tools@@g' > > Anyone have any objections to this change?
I'd just like to make the following points: 1. You're introducing a distinct lack of clarity about what is actually being performed. 2. The dynamic linker issue is such a critical aspect in the whole process that it warrants highlighting. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
