Package freeze

2008-10-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Right now all the tickets for packages and instructions have been fixed. Any new packages should be targeted to 7.0 from now on. If there is a strong security issue, we will address that, but normal updates should not go into 6.4. There are three open tickets for 6.4. One is a bootscript issu

Re: perl-5.10.0

2008-10-29 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 2008/10/29 Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Useless warnings: who cares. > > Authors of CGI scripts, because users see the warnings, at least > under thttpd. Well, Apache puts those into syslog but (AFAIK anyway) does not spit them out to the user. But still:

Re: perl-5.10.0

2008-10-29 Thread Robert Connolly
I have been using: -Dlibc=/tools/lib/libc-2.8.so -Ulocincpth -Uloclibpth \ -Dglibpth="/tools/lib" -Dusrinc="/tools/include" to replace the Perl libc patch. It works for me. robert pgpFewIHe1asR.pgp Description: PGP signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: Building GCC-4.3.2

2008-10-29 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:45:24 -0700, Rob Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is my first post so I may be way late to the party, but I've found > the following "bugs" in the unstable LFS tree(svn20081026): > > 2) 5.5. GCC-4.3.2 - Pass 1: There is no explanation for the compile > option... >

Building GCC-4.3.2

2008-10-29 Thread Rob Thornton
This is my first post so I may be way late to the party, but I've found the following "bugs" in the unstable LFS tree(svn20081026): 2) 5.5. GCC-4.3.2 - Pass 1: There is no explanation for the compile option... --disable-libssp ...in the list of meanings. Second, for those who don't know why,

Re: perl-5.10.0

2008-10-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
2008/10/29 Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Useless warnings: who cares. Authors of CGI scripts, because users see the warnings, at least under thttpd. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See

Re: Building SVN-20081028 on a Playstation 3

2008-10-29 Thread Gilles Espinasse
Selon John Frankish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... > > The ps3 cell processor is 64bit, but ydl-6 is compiled 32bit. Due to > the ps3 memory limitation - 256MB - I'm not sure building a 64bit lfs > system would be a good idea... > > John > I don't think we support the full compilation from a 64b cpu to

Re: Building SVN-20081028 on a Playstation 3

2008-10-29 Thread John Frankish
At 13:28 29-10-08, you wrote: >Selon John Frankish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > My apologies if this is the wrong list for this post.. > > > > Due to the fact that lfs SVN-20081028 uses gcc-4.3 and a 2.6.27 > > kernel, which both contain various ps3 specific optimisation > > possibilities

Re: Building SVN-20081028 on a Playstation 3

2008-10-29 Thread Gilles Espinasse
Selon John Frankish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > My apologies if this is the wrong list for this post.. > > Due to the fact that lfs SVN-20081028 uses gcc-4.3 and a 2.6.27 > kernel, which both contain various ps3 specific optimisation > possibilities, I'm very interested by the idea of building

Building SVN-20081028 on a Playstation 3

2008-10-29 Thread John Frankish
Hi, My apologies if this is the wrong list for this post.. Due to the fact that lfs SVN-20081028 uses gcc-4.3 and a 2.6.27 kernel, which both contain various ps3 specific optimisation possibilities, I'm very interested by the idea of building an lfs system on a Playstation 3 using ydl-6 as a h