Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> No, not good. Ignoring the fact that the command is broken, and no time
>> to look right now, but the `dirname $(gcc
>> -print-libgcc-file-name)`/include/limits.h file needs the
>> ../include-fixed/syslimits.h, which includes this string. Removi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Then:
>
> root [ ~ ]# ls -l /tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include-fixed/
> total 12
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3470 2008-10-19 18:59 limits.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 750 2008-10-19 18:59 README
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 330 2008-10-19 18:59 syslimits.h
The RH 6.2
DJ Lucas wrote:
> No, not good. Ignoring the fact that the command is broken, and no time
> to look right now, but the `dirname $(gcc
> -print-libgcc-file-name)`/include/limits.h file needs the
> ../include-fixed/syslimits.h, which includes this string. Removing the
> gcc version of limits.h
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> With the upgrade to gcc 4.3.2, I believe the section in the toolchain
> adjustment in chapter 5 that deals with fixed includes is broken. For
> those of you that have recently built with jhalfs, I'd appreciate it if
> you'd look in your logs to verify that
Hello all,
With the upgrade to gcc 4.3.2, I believe the section in the toolchain
adjustment in chapter 5 that deals with fixed includes is broken. For
those of you that have recently built with jhalfs, I'd appreciate it if
you'd look in your logs to verify that the following commands have
actu
Hello,
First off, thanks to everyone for the comments given, they were very
helpful. Based in part on the comments, and upon my own estimation of
the project, I have a proposal to make wrt the future of the project.
I'll try to keep it as brief as possible, but here are the changes to
the goal
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2115
>
> I am starting to address the subject ticket. I propose to follow Chris'
> suggestion and move the 'Toolchain Technical Notes' section to the appendix
> between Acknowledgments and Dependencies. I will then change the
>
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2115
I am starting to address the subject ticket. I propose to follow Chris'
suggestion and move the 'Toolchain Technical Notes' section to the appendix
between Acknowledgments and Dependencies. I will then change the Introduction
to refer to 'Toolc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Three tests were skipped:
>>
>> cannot tell stack overflow from crash; consider installing libsigsegv
>> SKIP: test-c-stack2.sh
>> Skipping test: multithreading not enabled
>> SKIP: test-lock
>> Skipping test: multithreading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert Connolly wrote:
> On Sunday October 19 2008 12:05:24 am Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> I can't seem to find the original texinfo-4.13 package anywhere... :-(
>>
>> Oh well.
>
> This is the original, from September 19th:
> ftp://ftp.freefriends.o
On Sunday October 19 2008 12:05:24 am Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I wish I *could* check the differences; I'm curious what they changed.
> I can't seem to find the original texinfo-4.13 package anywhere... :-(
>
> Oh well.
This is the original, from September 19th:
ftp://ftp.freefriends.org/texinfo/hi
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Using m4 in the temporary tools and installing it after
autoconfin chapter 6 makes a tool of a autoconf link to the m4 in /tools
> Bruce
12 matches
Mail list logo
