Dennis Clarke wrote:
> you know .. I really like the atmosphere in the LFS project.
> Such a nice bunch of people.
Oh, we've had our moments. You don't even have to go very far back in
the archives to read some. :(
But I think, on the whole, we all prefer a nicer, friendlier atmosphere,
and we
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
> > working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
> > the boot loader issue .. eventually.
>
> Don't
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
> working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
> the boot loader issue .. eventually.
Don't apologize. :) Dropping in is welcome.
> Just FYI.
Thanks for the reminder, Dennis. I'll
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
> release
> > sometime this summer.
>
> At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
> sans packa
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
>> we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
>
> Since I see a mention of udev:
>
> Over t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
> we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
Since I see a mention of udev:
Over the past couple weeks, I've started to l
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
> release
> sometime this summer.
At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
sans package manager.
However, x86_64 support (and PowerPC, for that matter) is pretty much
ready
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm guessing 4.3.1 will be out soon, and that it will be worth
> playing with.
I've done some testing with 4.3.0 as well. It's a little cranky. And
based on similar reports I also decided to hold off working on updating
-dev until a new release. Otherwise, I may have added i
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:47:42PM +0300, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> Now I am in a position that I don't know if we should continue with LFS,
> as development doesn't simple happen anymore.
> The new gcc is out for months,
I'm not doing _any_ book development at the moment (hope to get
away
On Thu, 08 May 2008 22:47:42 +0200, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Years ago, I suggested a whole chapter or a new book, for the Kernel
> related stuff [boot process (init ...), udev, filesystems, virtual
> machines, etc...].
> We did also found the man (Alexander) who could a
Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> In my opinion the kernel page is too sparse and static for its
> significance.
I agree.
> Linux development is rapid these days, so its mission impossible for a
> man to follow all that new exciting stuff.
It's always rapid. Keeping up requires daily effort.
> Ye
On Fri, May 09, at 12:02 Philipp Christian Loewner wrote:
>
> First I had installed udev-120 but my system didn't
> boot. It turned out to be a problem due to missing
> kernel features, but I didn't recompile 120 after
> I had installed 113 then.
> Perhaps a hint in the book saying which kernel
>
Hi everyone!
After completing my school's final
exams, I found time to do the LFS build.
Here is a quick summary:
I used the development LFS book version 20080423
but the newest available packages.
As for the system specs, it is a 32bit system running
the actual LFS live CD at build time.
I don'
13 matches
Mail list logo
