Dan Nicholson wrote:
> yacc (bison) - Definitely needed since we patch the bash parse.y file
> in Ch. 5 and yacc will need to be rerun. Could add bison to Ch. 5
> before bash, but IMO it's easier for the host to just install bison.
>
>
yup. definitely easier, that was how I addressed the missing
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Randy echoed my thoughts in a much better manner. We should not check
> > for something if the result of the check does not make any difference
> > in the build.
>
> Agreed, and I don't think we're doing that right
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Sukucorp Sukucorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > yacc (bison) - Definitely needed since we patch the bash parse.y file
> > in Ch. 5 and yacc will need to be rerun. Could add bison t
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yacc (bison) - Definitely needed since we patch the bash parse.y file
> in Ch. 5 and yacc will need to be rerun. Could add bison to Ch. 5
> before bash, but IMO it's easier for the host to just install bison.
I don't
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sukucorp Sukucorp wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> + [bdubbs] - Updated host requirments to check for
> >> + symbolic links from sh, awk, and yacc.
> >
> >
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Sukucorp Sukucorp wrote these words on 04/11/08 15:52 CST:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I was responding to some earlier comments about sh->dash causing problmes.
>>> I
>>> added the part about yacc and awk because I know
- Original Message -
From: "Sukucorp Sukucorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: r8518 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 prologue
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > I was re
Sukucorp Sukucorp wrote these words on 04/11/08 15:52 CST:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was responding to some earlier comments about sh->dash causing problmes.
>> I
>> added the part about yacc and awk because I know thy are sometimes used,
>>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was responding to some earlier comments about sh->dash causing problmes. I
> added the part about yacc and awk because I know thy are sometimes used, but
> I
> don't know for sure if they are essential for LFS. It i
Sukucorp Sukucorp wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> + [bdubbs] - Updated host requirments to check for
>> + symbolic links from sh, awk, and yacc.
>
> Was there a bug report for this or did anyone run into any problems?
>
> I don't know a
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + [bdubbs] - Updated host requirments to check for
> + symbolic links from sh, awk, and yacc.
Was there a bug report for this or did anyone run into any problems?
I don't know about bison/yacc, but I did not have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
