Re: grep 2.5.3

2007-08-23 Thread Richard Gill
2007/8/23, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nice job with the research. Just one note on the above, the use of cat > and the pipe isn't necessary. Sed will dump the ouput of the adjusted > file to stdout by default. sed 'expression' file > newfile. Ho yes, an old habit of mine :-) I could h

Re: Bootstrap GCC Pass 1 or 2? (was Re: Resolution)

2007-08-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Greg Schafer wrote: > Why can't you just figure out what the real problem is? ie: debug it. It > would save me having to do it :-) I'll take a crack at it. Haven't done anything the last few days though because I've been sick. > True. If skipping the bootstrap on pass1 allows it to build when be

Re: Bootstrap GCC Pass 1 or 2? (was Re: Resolution)

2007-08-23 Thread Greg Schafer
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Even after fixing this, there remains an issue with > bootstrapping GCC pass 1 (the actual error appears to be related to a > mis-generated spec file for stage 2 - I can set this up again if you > need to see the exact error), and the root cause is probably connected >

Re: grep 2.5.3

2007-08-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Richard Gill wrote: > cat Makefile.orig | sed 's/SUBDIRS = intl po lib doc/SUBDIRS = intl po lib/' \ > > Makefile Nice job with the research. Just one note on the above, the use of cat and the pipe isn't necessary. Sed will dump the ouput of the adjusted file to stdout by default. sed 'exp

Re: grep 2.5.3

2007-08-23 Thread Richard Gill
2007/8/23, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I encourage you to look at the Trac bug reporting system > before you post messages about package updates. If you > would have, you'd have seen that ticket #2054 > (http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2054) > contains your findings plus add

Re: grep 2.5.3

2007-08-23 Thread Randy McMurchy
Richard Gill wrote: > again me, with not up to date softwares :-) > This time, it's for grep which is at release 2.5.3, while LFS still is > at 2.5.1a. I encourage you to look at the Trac bug reporting system before you post messages about package updates. If you would have, you'd have seen that

Re: Bootstrap GCC Pass 1 or 2? (was Re: Resolution)

2007-08-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Greg Schafer wrote: > Conversely, the more I think about it, the more I don't like it.. will say > more after I've done some analysis. However, I haven't written it off yet.. Looking forward to it. > We are trying to eliminate the "target ld doesn't like host libc" issue, > aren't we? If so, the

grep 2.5.3

2007-08-23 Thread Richard Gill
Hi again me, with not up to date softwares :-) This time, it's for grep which is at release 2.5.3, while LFS still is at 2.5.1a. One drawback if texinfo isn't installed on the host system: this's not detected by configure and the process fails when building the documentation. The workaround (as

Re: gcc 4.2.1

2007-08-23 Thread Richard Gill
2007/8/23, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 4.2 had both the issues (took forever to compile, and also took a ton of > memory). One of the two got fixed in 4.2.1, but I don't remember which. > I *think* one or more of the xorg pieces exhibited the issue. hmmm, I'll wait the specialists take

Re: gcc 4.2.1

2007-08-23 Thread Bryan Kadzban
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Richard Gill wrote: > 2007/8/23, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> and that gcc-4.2.1 has some strange differences from 4.1.2 (one of >> which is the bootstrap thing you mentioned, but another of which is >> that it either takes forever, or ta