El Domingo, 25 de Febrero de 2007 00:43, Ken Moffat escribió:
> Sorry I'm a bit later than I'd like in replying to this, but I saw
> these running farce on the book as it was in December. Didn't
> bother reporting it, so feel free to moan at me.
Thanks for remembering that now.
My second ICA/f
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 06:41:27PM +0100, M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 12:40, M.Canales.es escribió:
>
> >
> > I'm doing the ICA/farce build now.
> >
>
> ICA and farce reports this differs:
>
> FAIL: /usr/lib/libstdc++.la is different
> FAIL: /usr/lib/libsupc++.la is
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 21:38, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> I had thought that the alphabetical branch didn't even touch chapter 5?
There was some changes, included the removal of the commented-out Bison and
Flex lines, when doned the merge. See
svn diff -r7279:7489 chapter05/chapter05
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 21:34, M.Canales.es escribió:
> I'm doing now a new ICA/farce build but with M4 to see if that two binaries
> differs also or not.
Another cause could be that my system have now a very big load and ocasionally
I have aleatories build fails (two times in the last
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Hmm, it looks like someone removed the old commented entries for bison
> and flex in Ch.5. Oh, that was our work in alphabetical. I guess if we
I had thought that the alphabetical branch didn't even touch chapter 5?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 21:28, Dan Nicholson escribió:
>
> Did you ever find out if the diffs in cc1 were related to the m4 removal?
>
I'm doing now a new ICA/farce build but with M4 to see if that two binaries
differs also or not.
If they not differ, M4 should be retained and maybe ad
On 2/24/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 12:58, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
>
> > Thanks. Could you please patch your local copy of the book and determine
> > via jhalfs whether it is still usable with HJL binutils, if one doesn't
> > drop m4? If no
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 12:58, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> Thanks. Could you please patch your local copy of the book and determine
> via jhalfs whether it is still usable with HJL binutils, if one doesn't
> drop m4? If not, then I really see no reason to keep it.
HJL Binutils comp
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 12:40, M.Canales.es escribió:
>
> I'm doing the ICA/farce build now.
>
ICA and farce reports this differs:
FAIL: /usr/lib/libstdc++.la is different
FAIL: /usr/lib/libsupc++.la is different
That two has been here from always.
FAIL: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I was wondering if the IRC logs are available online. It doesn't look
> like it to me, at least not at the old location:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ircd/
>
> But that makes sense since ircd is not in a home directory anymore on
> quantum, but in /srv/ircd. I don't k
On 2/24/07, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > I was wondering if the IRC logs are available online. It doesn't look
> > like it to me, at least not at the old location:
>
> No, they aren't currently publicly available. Although, they could be
> made so if enough
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> See Manuel's commits r7942 and r7943. The titles now read "Linux 2.6.20.1 API
> Headers".
Ah. Very good.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/linux-headers.html
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/linux-headers.html
After looking at the pages again, it seems to me that the confusion
arises because of the title of the page.
On Saturday 24 February 2007 17:11, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> The use of the name 'Linux-Headers-2.6.20' seems to imply that it is a
> separate package, very similar to the rest of the book. If we changed
> the title to something like 'Linux-2.6.20 Sanitized Headers' or
> something similar, it might
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I was wondering if the IRC logs are available online. It doesn't look
> like it to me, at least not at the old location:
No, they aren't currently publicly available. Although, they could be
made so if enough people deemed it necessary or desirable.
--
JH
--
http://linuxf
One of the CLFS developers wrote on lfs-dev that some users on IRC
were confused about whether the Linux headers were the CLFS headers or
not.
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/058935.html
The LFS editors are having a hard time seeing this perspective since
we're all awa
I was wondering if the IRC logs are available online. It doesn't look
like it to me, at least not at the old location:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ircd/
But that makes sense since ircd is not in a home directory anymore on
quantum, but in /srv/ircd. I don't know if any extra setup is needed
On 2/24/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M.Canales.es wrote:
> >
> > Also BLFS should close #2241 to allow editors to install the new DTD on
> > their
> > hosts.
>
> Randy has assigned that ticket to himself. I can update quantum and
> anduin anytime, but I haven't looked at the proce
M.Canales.es wrote:
OK, thanks for the explanation. I understand what was happening now.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 17:14, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Randy has assigned that ticket to himself. I can update quantum and
> anduin anytime, but I haven't looked at the procedure to do that.
> However, I can't imagine it being much different from what we have now.
On that ticket there i
M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 05:20, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any
>>> changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or
>>> Bruce.
>> Actually, anyone with commit pri
On 2/24/07, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OTOH, I don't know why most of these people think it's the CLFS package
> either -- are they doing a search on linux-headers and finding that
> package? Or are they doing something else that's pointing them there?
> I don't think any of thes
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I found dead Link(s) in the Documentation:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/nano.html
The Link to this Page is dead:
ftp://ftp.uni-koeln.de/editor/nano-2.0.1.tar.gz
Thanks
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachri
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 14:49, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> No complaints here, Manuel. Thanks!
Done in r7942 and r7943
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
On Saturday 24 February 2007 13:44, M.Canales.es wrote:
> Also I vote for changing the pages title to "Linux-2.6.20 API Headers"
>
> I can do both changes later today if there are no complaints.
No complaints here, Manuel. Thanks!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: htt
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 14:30, Bryan Kadzban escribió:
> Or, since I'm not at all sure how the automatic indexing stuff works yet
> in DocBook ({indexterm}, etc.), perhaps it would be possible to just
> remove the hyphens for that package, and call it "Linux 2.6.20 Headers"
> or "Linux H
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 2/20/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2/19/07, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1. Perhaps it should be made somewhat clearer that the
>>> "Linux-Headers" installation comes from the kernel tarball. More
>>> than one user has come into the IRC c
M.Canales.es wrote:
> What's the download URL for current HJL binutils?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/binutils-2.17.50.0.12.tar.bz2
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 12:58, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> Thanks. Could you please patch your local copy of the book and determine
> via jhalfs whether it is still usable with HJL binutils, if one doesn't
> drop m4? If not, then I really see no reason to keep it.
What's the downlo
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 13:02, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
>
> Does this mean that LFS LiveCD 6.3-pre2 has to use jhalfs from SVN trunk?
>
We want to release jhalfs-2.2 in a week or so.
Plus that fixes it will have also other fixes for CLFSx books and add support
for BLFS-6.2.
--
M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 20:26, M.Canales.es escribió:
>
>> That should corfim that the issue is in jhalfs, not related with the book
>> or the GCC/Glibc planned updates.
>
> And fixed.
>
> After knowing what was causing the segfault in both a full build and later
M.Canales.es wrote:
> A previous sucessful build with all final system testsuites enabled show that
> the removal of M4 from chapter05 don't afect the testsuites.
Thanks. Could you please patch your local copy of the book and determine via
jhalfs whether it is still usable with HJL binutils, if
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 00:36, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Manuel,
> I've only been following this casually. What was different about the
> chroot command that would cause a segfault?
The first issue was that chapter06/115-strippingagain script was using
#!/bin/bash as the shabang, thus
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 05:49, Dan Nicholson escribió:
>
> Manuel, since you're all set up to do the ICA builds with jhalfs,
> could you remove m4 from Ch. 5 and see if anything happens?
I'm doing the ICA/farce build now.
A previous sucessful build with all final system testsuites enab
El Sábado, 24 de Febrero de 2007 05:20, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any
> > changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or
> > Bruce.
>
> Actually, anyone with commit privs can create a tag or
35 matches
Mail list logo
