Re: Glibc 2.5 SCSI headers (SVN20061021)

2006-11-12 Thread Alex Merry
On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:50, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 11/12/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/11/06, Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've noticed that Glibc (2.5) overwrites the scsi headers > > > installed as part of the "linux headers" step (linux 2.6.18.1). > >

Re: Upgrade to Linux-2.6.18

2006-11-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: I like this better. Cleaner, shorter, and it uses the defaults from the package. And doing the check doesn't hurt ever. Jeremy, what tools are needed in the check? I just don't want to add to the host system requirements for the Ch. 5 headers. Not su

Re: Upgrade to Linux-2.6.18

2006-11-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Dan Nicholson wrote: I like this better. Cleaner, shorter, and it uses the defaults from the package. And doing the check doesn't hurt ever. Jeremy, what tools are needed in the check? I just don't want to add to the host system requirements for the Ch. 5 headers. Not sure what it uses when che

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Robert Connolly wrote: There are now 5 patches in: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ Maybe its worth combining them. Indeed. I have a patch sitting around that does just this. Unfortunately, with a 6-hour build time real life often gets in the way of hav

Re: Upgrade to Linux-2.6.18

2006-11-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/11/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > If you don't like the above approach, then I suggest we put in an explanation as > to why we install to a temporary directory first and add the '-v' flag to the cp > command. Actually, after looking through the Li

Re: Glibc 2.5 SCSI headers (SVN20061021)

2006-11-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/12/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/11/06, Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed that Glibc (2.5) overwrites the scsi headers > installed as part of the "linux headers" step (linux 2.6.18.1). > > Does this matter? I think it's ok and the right thing to do. Fed

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/12/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: > In fact, it's probably simpler if we just pass --disable-nls to > everything since the localization just bloats /tools anyway. DIY has > been doing this for a long time by putting enable_nls=no in a > CONFIG_SITE file.

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Robert Connolly wrote: There are now 5 patches in: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ Maybe its worth combining them. Indeed. In fact, as I look at those there, I see that Jim already submitted a patch that they've accepted for this very issue: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Dan Nicholson wrote: In fact, it's probably simpler if we just pass --disable-nls to everything since the localization just bloats /tools anyway. DIY has been doing this for a long time by putting enable_nls=no in a CONFIG_SITE file. Well, at least for /tools, I'd vote for using --disable-nls e

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/11/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: /usr/bin/msgfmt: too many errors, aborting make[2]: *** [ru.gmo] Error 1 The fix is simple enough, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2006-10/msg00076.html However, I'd suggest a simple sed command instead of the patch so that the

Re: bash and msgfmt

2006-11-12 Thread Robert Connolly
There are now 5 patches in: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ Maybe its worth combining them. robert On Sunday 12 November 2006 01:41, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Here's an interesting error. Happens in Chapter 5 Bash, when running > 'make install', using lfslivecd-x86-6.2-3 as the host