Re: vim 'rm -vf'

2006-10-21 Thread Robert Connolly
It's not necessary, but we're using -v everywhere possible, because its more verbose and educational. I'm just pointing out a place where it's missing. robert On Sunday 22 October 2006 01:25, F.J.Zhao wrote: > >From man rm: > > -v, --verbose: > explain what is being done > > So '-v' is

Re: vim 'rm -vf'

2006-10-21 Thread F . J . Zhao
From man rm: -v, --verbose: explain what is being done So '-v' is not necessary. 2006/10/22, Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: In chapter06/vim.html: rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.{gr,pl,ru,sk} rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.??.* Should those have -v? robert -

vim 'rm -vf'

2006-10-21 Thread Robert Connolly
In chapter06/vim.html: rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.{gr,pl,ru,sk} rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.??.* Should those have -v? robert pgp0U4a7WTxid.pgp Description: PGP signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ U

Re: util-linux 'cp -v'

2006-10-21 Thread Robert Connolly
In chapter06/util-linux.html: mkdir -p /var/lib/hwclock Should have a -v. robert pgpEdRkcJkINJ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page