It's not necessary, but we're using -v everywhere possible, because its more verbose and educational. I'm just pointing out a place where it's missing.
robert
On Sunday 22 October 2006 01:25, F.J.Zhao wrote:
> >From man rm:
>
> -v, --verbose:
> explain what is being done
>
> So '-v' is not necessary.
>
> 2006/10/22, Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In chapter06/vim.html:
> >
> > rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.{gr,pl,ru,sk}
> > rm -f /usr/share/vim/vim70/tutor/tutor.??.*
> >
> > Should those have -v?
> >
> > robert
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> > Unsubscribe: See the above information page
pgpBrpcozoK8F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
