[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updated the kernel to version 2.6.16.26
Can someone please upload the utf8_input patch for this kernel? If it
is just a copy from the previous, let me know, since I am trying to get
the pre1 package tarball out the door and synced on the mirrors. It isn't:
http://
The LFS team is proud to announce the release of LFS-6.2-pre1, the first
pre-release of the upcoming LFS-6.2 book.
You can read it online or you can download the book from to read it at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.2/
For a full list of changes, I refer you to the changelog included
Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
> In any case I got my system back on its feet as far as I can tell, and
> in a mighty display of boldness, I'm running jhalfs again. I'll report
> back.
LOL. Good luck!
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
* Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-15 20:29]:
> Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 07/15/06 19:11 CST:
OK, after analysis of the evidence left, and pondering and reading of
jhalfs files, I've convinced myself that it was my mistake.
I believe that in my current build some stuff was
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:21:17PM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> It's been a pleasure working with the community for so long. Thanks to
> everyone for making it such an enjoyable and rewarding experience.
>
(just catching up, I've been without connectivity for 10 days)
Matt,
it was a ple
Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 07/15/06 19:11 CST:
> Goodbye and thank you for choosing
You gotta be joking me, it actually says this? :-)
> and now my system's b0rked. Watch this:
>
> 0[/bin]$ l | grep tool
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Nov 18 2005 bash -> /tools/bin/bash
>
Hi,
I'm sending this to lfs-dev since I'm not subscribed to alfs-dev and I'm
in some sort of emergency.
I was all set up to use jhalfs to test the current lfs book, and I believe
it messed up my system. After a couple of false starts, jhalfs told me
this:
Building the system...
-
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Alex Merry wrote:
> > Robert was suggesting a change that would allow the sed to be applied to
> > other *FLAGS variables. When you consider the dangers in constructing and
> > running commands you don't fully understand in the compilat
Jim Gifford wrote:
Hey guys just wanted to let you know I posted the question about the
current headers in 2.6.18, how there are still some unresolved issues.
For those who are interested, here's the link to the email.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/11/562
This thread is starting to get interest
Alex Merry wrote:
>
> But surely the only way anyone would have anything on that line is if
> they'd already been doing something different to the book, in which case
> (especially with the toolchain) they should be acutely aware of what the
> instructions do and the possible implications of any ch
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:13:53PM -0400, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Robert Connolly wrote:
> >
> >> This isn't a bug, but the line:
> >>
> >> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
> >>
> >> can be problematic if a user uses this command to modify other variables,
> >> be
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>
>> This isn't a bug, but the line:
>>
>> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
>>
>> can be problematic if a user uses this command to modify other variables,
>> because the -fomit-frame-pointer is appended to the end of the line. Some of
>>
Alex Merry wrote these words on 07/15/06 12:59 CST:
> It will not for example, match
> XCFLAGS = -g -O2
> The reason is obvious: there is no end-of-line after the =, which is
> what $ matches.
Exactly what I've been trying to get across to Robert, but every time
I've provided an example 'sed' to
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 12:40:54PM -0400, Robert Connolly wrote:
> On July 15, 2006 12:26 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Robert Connolly wrote these words on 07/15/06 11:13 CST:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' tf
> > stuff
> > XCFLAGS = -g -O2
> > more st
On July 15, 2006 12:26 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote these words on 07/15/06 11:13 CST:
> > Both '^XCFLAGS =$' and '^XCFLAGS =' match this.
>
> Okay then, explain this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > cat tf
> stuff
> XCFLAGS = -g -O2
> more stuff
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build
Robert Connolly wrote these words on 07/15/06 11:13 CST:
> Both '^XCFLAGS =$' and '^XCFLAGS =' match this.
Okay then, explain this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > cat tf
stuff
XCFLAGS = -g -O2
more stuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' tf
stuff
XCFLAGS = -
On July 15, 2006 10:29 am, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote these words on 07/15/06 09:14 CST:
> > XCFLAGS = -g -O2
> >
> > sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' will change it into:
> >
> > XCFLAGS = -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
>
> Not on my systems. That sed will not match the
Wojciech Giel wrote:
Hi
Thise is my first post and first compilation.
I followed this book
Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20060619
Chapter 6. Installing Basic System Software
6.9. Glibc-2.3.6
and i got this errors
:
make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]:
Hi
Thise is my first post and first compilation.
I followed this book
Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20060619
Chapter 6. Installing Basic System Software
6.9. Glibc-2.3.6
and i got this errors
:
make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-bu
Robert Connolly wrote these words on 07/15/06 09:14 CST:
> XCFLAGS = -g -O2
>
> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' will change it into:
>
> XCFLAGS = -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
Not on my systems. That sed will not match the line!
'^XCFLAGS =$' does not equal 'XCFLAGS = -g -O2'
Those
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/14/06 22:46 CST:
>> I am ready to branch lfs-6.2-pre1. This is a last call for changes
>> before that is done.
>
> To me, this breakage discovered when the find command was moved is
> a show-stopper.
I agree. It is now fixed.
-- Bru
On July 15, 2006 09:55 am, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/15/06 08:44 CST:
> > Robert Connolly wrote:
> >> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
> >>
> >> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
> >
> > I'd be interested in other opinions.
> I fail to see what
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/15/06 08:44 CST:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>>
>> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
>>
>> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
>
> I'd be interested in other opinions.
I fail to see what Robert's sed does. To me, it either:
1) does exactly the sa
Robert Connolly wrote:
> This isn't a bug, but the line:
>
> sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
>
> can be problematic if a user uses this command to modify other variables,
> because the -fomit-frame-pointer is appended to the end of the line. Some of
> the *FLAGS in GCC end with a \
This isn't a bug, but the line:
sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
can be problematic if a user uses this command to modify other variables,
because the -fomit-frame-pointer is appended to the end of the line. Some of
the *FLAGS in GCC end with a \ character at the end of the first lin
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 07/15/06 07:06 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> It is whatever you want to call instructions that are wrong and
>> don't work. You sir, may call it anything you like. I will, however,
>> fix the book.
>
> So don't they work? Can you give an example?
Simply do wha
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/14/06 22:46 CST:
> I am ready to branch lfs-6.2-pre1. This is a last call for changes
> before that is done.
To me, this breakage discovered when the find command was moved is
a show-stopper.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc
Sounds good to me... Yeah! I've successfully contributed a whole
semi-colon to LFS :-)
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Anthony Wright wrote:
X=%k; X=${X#usbdev}; B=${X%%.*} D=${X#*.}; echo bus/usb/$B/$D
produces
bus/usb/1/2
Let's go with it then.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
28 matches
Mail list logo
