Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> The problem is not "how" (which is already dealt with), but "why". I.e.,
one could say that some sysfs attributes for SCSI devices are created
after the uevent is sent. That's why we have the WAIT_FOR_SYSFS rule
that waits for "ioerr_cnt".
But it will be certainly be
How about you guys please take this in private. This is getting rather
personal and this isn't the place I'm afraid.
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
TheOldFellow wrote these words on 05/29/06 14:29 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> Some of whom paid that price to defend *your* country.
>
> I asked because I didn't know.
I took your message the wrong way. If instead of trying to make a
joke, you had said, "What holiday is that you guys are honor
Randy McMurchy wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote these words on 05/29/06 11:25 CST:
What Holy Day?
Please, Richard, be careful here. Lest someone will be truly offended.
In America, this day is revered in memory of friends and family members
that have paid the ultimate sacrifice in time of war.
Some
On 5/29/06, Thomas Ulrich Nockmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
the md5sum of tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz as stated on
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/typesetting.html#tetex
seems to be wrong.
See links -dump \
http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX/3.0/distrib/CHE
On 5/29/06, Thomas Ulrich Nockmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
while installing cpio-2.6 as described at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/cpio.html
I'd got a Segmentation fault while executing 'make -C doc pdf'.
This is a blfs-support issue.
The LFS on this machine is a
TheOldFellow wrote these words on 05/29/06 11:25 CST:
> What Holy Day?
Please, Richard, be careful here. Lest someone will be truly offended.
In America, this day is revered in memory of friends and family members
that have paid the ultimate sacrifice in time of war.
Some of whom paid that price
Hello,
while installing cpio-2.6 as described at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/cpio.html
I'd got a Segmentation fault while executing 'make -C doc pdf'.
The LFS on this machine is a mixture between Stable LFS and Development
BLFS.
But what I see is that the installati
Hello,
the md5sum of tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz as stated on
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/typesetting.html#tetex
seems to be wrong.
See links -dump \
http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX/3.0/distrib/CHECKSUMS\
| grep tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz
\|||/
`@|@`thomas
-
-
On 5/29/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is not "how" (which is already dealt with), but "why". I.e., one
could say that some sysfs attributes for SCSI devices are created after the
uevent is sent. That's why we have the WAIT_FOR_SYSFS rule that waits for
"ioerr_cn
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Who put you in charge of something as important as changing the
fundamental way things are done? You gotta be kidding. You are
going to call for a vote during a holiday weekend and end it
during that same holiday weekend. Totally unreasonable.
What Holy Day?
R.
--
http:
> The problem is not "how" (which is already dealt with), but "why". I.e.,
one could say that some sysfs attributes for SCSI devices are created
after the uevent is sent. That's why we have the WAIT_FOR_SYSFS rule
that waits for "ioerr_cnt".
But it will be certainly better to show where exactl
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
1. Target audience. It is impossible to understand udev and kernel
fully without reading the source. So, at least for some sections, a
working knowledge of C must be assumed. AFAIK, this is unacceptable
for the LFS book.
Indeed, and in fac
Hi guys,
I think I'm one of few who just gotten utterly lost in the long threads
regarding the issues of udev and bootscripts. I'm not going to raise the
noise on this list by asking for summaries because I think I no longer
understand the viewpoints of the affected projects (co-) leaders. I'v
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
1. Target audience. It is impossible to understand udev and kernel fully
without reading the source. So, at least for some sections, a working
knowledge of C must be assumed. AFAIK, this is unacceptable for the LFS
book.
Indeed, and in fact, I think it is unaccep
On 5/29/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By my count there are 5 that indicated contrary. Most of those
said to leave things they way they are. In fact, I believe (I'm
not going back to check, so I could be wrong), all 5 are editors
in the project as well.
Including the project co
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simply because the adequate (i.e.: with good educational value and
technical
correctness) explanation of the udev topic is way too thick for the
LFS book.
Why? BLFS is up to about 1100 pages and LFS is somewhere
On Mon, May 29, at 06:48:42 Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Who put you in charge of something as important as changing the
> fundamental way things are done? You gotta be kidding. You are
> going to call for a vote during a holiday weekend and end it
> during that same holiday weekend. Totally unreason
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
On Sun, May 28, at 07:04:20 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
perhaps a new book with any relative info that has to do with:
a.'Handling Devices' (udev)
b.'Boot process' (init schemes,bootscripts,bootmanager,etc)
c.'Automounting Devices'
d.'Volumes,raid
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I will come back to my house late night, and if there is no serious reason
against the
idea, the voting procedure will come to an end.
Who put you in charge of something as important as changing the
fundamental way things are done? You gotta be kidding. You are
going to
On 5/29/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simply because the adequate (i.e.: with good educational value and technical
correctness) explanation of the udev topic is way too thick for the LFS book.
Why? BLFS is up to about 1100 pages and LFS is somewhere around 300.
There is
1. Xorg-server says it depends on Xorg fonts and Xorg libs. However,
Xorg fonts already needs Apps, which needs Libs, so the Libs dependency
in server is redundant.
2. Same goes for the pkg-config dependency in xterm. It needs the
Xorg-server, which needs Fonts, which need Apps, which need Lib
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:59:14PM +0300, Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> I propose the creation of a new udev/bootscript/kernel/doc team.
> I nominate Alexander Patrakov as the new Leader of this project,
> and also Dan Nicholson, DJ Lucas, Ken Moffat as members of the team.
>
I've been away from
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 05/29/06 01:38 CST:
> Judging from the community reactions so far, it seems that is safe to assume
> that
> the community gave positive vote to the new project.
By my count there are 5 that indicated contrary. Most of those
said to leave things they way they
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
perhaps a new book with any relative info that has to do with:
a.'Handling Devices' (udev)
b.'Boot process' (init schemes,bootscripts,bootmanager,etc)
c.'Automounting Devices'
d.'Volumes,raid etc...'
e.'Partitiong sche
Hello World,
does anyone know why we apply the
cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8-includes-1.patch to cdparanoia? For me, it
builds and runs fine without the patch.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
perhaps a new book with any relative info that has to do with:
a.'Handling Devices' (udev)
b.'Boot process' (init schemes,bootscripts,bootmanager,etc)
c.'Automounting Devices'
d.'Volumes,raid etc...'
e.'Partitiong schemes,filesystems,etc'
f.'
On 5/29/06, Ag Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 28, at 04:59:14 Ag Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> I propose the creation of a new udev/bootscript/kernel/doc team.
> I nominate Alexander Patrakov as the new Leader of this project,
> and also Dan Nicholson, DJ Lucas, Ken Moffat as mem
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 00:18 -0400, Robert Connolly wrote:
> I have attached my preliminary/experimental differences to build HLFS with
> gcc-4.1.1 and glibc-2.4. Comments are welcome.
>
That's a whole pile of good work, and behind that is a lot of
frustrating unseen hours.
I am going to run with
Shane Shields wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
Guys,
I'm having real problems following the 'discussions' on bootscripts
and udev. The main issue is that the thread nesting has gotten so
deep that Thunderbird gives up. So I can't see who said what to whom
about what.
/me pops up from the dark
30 matches
Mail list logo
