Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-23 Thread Chris Staub
Joe Ciccone wrote: Robert Connolly wrote: What is the status of the new belgarath hardware? P.S. Has a macintosh (or other odder hardware) been considered? Would 5 Macintosh Plus systems be enough? I think they have at least 1Mb of ram each and a low density floppy. No, I think you would

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-23 Thread Joe Ciccone
Robert Connolly wrote: > What is the status of the new belgarath hardware? > > P.S. > Has a macintosh (or other odder hardware) been considered? > Would 5 Macintosh Plus systems be enough? I think they have at least 1Mb of ram each and a low density floppy. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-23 Thread Robert Connolly
What is the status of the new belgarath hardware? P.S. Has a macintosh (or other odder hardware) been considered? robert -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS vs BLFS -- udev rules

2006-04-23 Thread Chris Staub
Jim Gifford wrote: In CLFS, we create all the users and groups, this will solve all issues if LFS will follow. It will also simplify the BLFS instructions to adding users to the appropriate groups. It's a plus for all, eliminates so of tedious work the BLFS has to do managing users/groups and g

Re: Users and Groups

2006-04-23 Thread Matt Darcy
Joe Ciccone wrote: I put this page together with the users and groups from LFS and BLFS. The only addition I made to this page is a users groups with a gid of 100. Anyone that wants to set something in stone, this would be a good place to start. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jciccone/users.ht