Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Matthew Burgess wrote: OK then, your homework assignment is to proof-read the reworded section 7.4 and complain loudly at me if there's anything you don't understand or if you still have questions regarding how all this stuff hangs together :-) Some minor points. 1) s/hotplug event/uevent/.

Re: [DIY BUG] bash wants en_US locale

2006-02-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Greg Schafer wrote: Correct. However, the problem is with Readline and not Bash. You are of course right. Thanks for the correction. I noticed this in Chapter 5 as a difference between Glibc-based LFS and uClibc-based HLFS. That's why I thought it's bash. Now grep the Readline source for N

Re: Changelog unchanged

2006-02-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Archaic wrote these words on 02/08/06 16:42 CST: > Leave it as is. Any change requires a new date. Only technical > changes require a changelog entry. It's been done this way at least > since the lfs-editor manual has been around and it seems overly > reactionary to change it due to one report of

Re: Changelog unchanged

2006-02-08 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:18:41AM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > Manuel, I wonder if it's best to leave the date alone when making > strictly XML changes. Either that, or start adding Changelog entries for > them. Just so its not confusing to those comparing the Changelog with > the date.

Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-08 Thread Matthew Burgess
Richard A Downing wrote: OK. You are still confused about the use of 'may' and 'might'. Not confused, simply suffering from acute amnesia. Sorry, it should be correct on the next render. Thanks for the review! Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.l

Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-08 Thread Richard A Downing
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Richard A Downing wrote: > >> I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next >> important leap forward for Linux-kind - getting rid of hotpig, I mean, >> so I am now in class and paying attention. > > OK then, your homework assignment is to proof-r

Re: OOo-2.0.1, Xorg 7.0, Firefox-1.5 and System NSS/NSPR (Long)

2006-02-08 Thread Alan Lord
Jürg Billeter wrote: On Mit, 2006-02-08 at 20:58 +, Alan Lord wrote: In the Perl script set_soenv the offending line is: ToFile( "MOZ_NSPR_CFLAGS", "@MOZ_NSPR_CFLAGS@", "e" ); Am I being thick? Should I have only applied the nspr patch? On first glance it looks like you didn't regener

Re: [DIY BUG] bash wants en_US locale

2006-02-08 Thread Greg Schafer
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > some tme ago I imported from DIY linux the statement that none of the > locales are really required. As it stands now, this statement is wrong. > When checking whether the ctype macros accept non-ascii characters, Bash > configure script attempts to set the en_US.

Re: OOo-2.0.1, Xorg 7.0, Firefox-1.5 and System NSS/NSPR (Long)

2006-02-08 Thread Alan Lord
Jürg Billeter wrote: > OOo doesn't strictly require imake. IIRC it's just NAS which requires xmkmf and imake. I can certainley build OOo 2.0.1 (using ooo-build-2.0.1) without xmkmf and imake when disabling NAS. Thanks - that's good to know for next time round :-) HTH, Jürg [1] http://cv

Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Richard A Downing wrote: I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next important leap forward for Linux-kind - getting rid of hotpig, I mean, so I am now in class and paying attention. OK then, your homework assignment is to proof-read the rewor

Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-08 Thread Matthew Burgess
Richard A Downing wrote: I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next important leap forward for Linux-kind - getting rid of hotpig, I mean, so I am now in class and paying attention. OK then, your homework assignment is to proof-read the reworded section 7.4 and com

Re: OOo-2.0.1, Xorg 7.0, Firefox-1.5 and System NSS/NSPR (Long)

2006-02-08 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Mit, 2006-02-08 at 19:32 +, Alan Lord wrote: > When I get to OOo is where the trouble starts... > > OOo needs imake :-( OOo doesn't strictly require imake. IIRC it's just NAS which requires xmkmf and imake. I can certainley build OOo 2.0.1 (using ooo-build-2.0.1) without xmkmf and imake w

Re: OOo-2.0.1, Xorg 7.0, Firefox-1.5 and System NSS/NSPR (Long)

2006-02-08 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/8/06, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had built Firefox using Randy's new method of the system NSS/NSPR > libraries. During the OO build it barfs because it can't find > "prtypes.h" which resides in /usr/include/nspr. > > checking MOZILLAXPCOM_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/firefox-1.5

Re: NSS again (this time a real issue)

2006-02-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/08/06 13:29 CST: > Randy, I just had another thought which you might not like. Why not > just change Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird so that their {nss,nspr}.pc > files are just symlinks to {nss,nspr}.pc? > > rm /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mozilla-ns*.pc > ln -sv nss.pc

OOo-2.0.1, Xorg 7.0, Firefox-1.5 and System NSS/NSPR (Long)

2006-02-08 Thread Alan Lord
Hi all, some notes about building the above apps... I have a nice new xorg 7.0 and Firefox 1.5 with the system NSS/NSPR install all working fine. When I get to OOo is where the trouble starts... OOo needs imake :-( To build OOo I found that one has to install (at least) these xorg utility fil

Re: Changelog unchanged

2006-02-08 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 8 de Febrero de 2006 15:18, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > Manuel, I wonder if it's best to leave the date alone when making > strictly XML changes. Either that, or start adding Changelog entries for > them. Just so its not confusing to those comparing the Changelog with > the date. We

Re: Changelog unchanged

2006-02-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Kev Buckley wrote: the Changelog in Version SVN-20060207 still doesn't seem to list any changes older than January 30, 2006 I don't think anything in the actual book has changed since the 30th. The *XML source* of the book has changed, though, since I know Manuel has been cleaning

[DIY BUG] bash wants en_US locale

2006-02-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello, some tme ago I imported from DIY linux the statement that none of the locales are really required. As it stands now, this statement is wrong. When checking whether the ctype macros accept non-ascii characters, Bash configure script attempts to set the en_US.ISO8859-1 locale. However, it

Changelog unchanged

2006-02-08 Thread Kev Buckley
Following on from someone flagging up that the Changelog went missing a few days back, I notice that: the Changelog in Version SVN-20060207 still doesn't seem to list any changes older than January 30, 2006 -- Regards, ---