Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-07 Thread Richard A Downing
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:31:03 + Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (or am I missing a sarcasm-detection plugin) That, along with my attention deficit disorder (which is why I can't stand long sentences). :-) I hadn't been following this branch, but decided that this is the next imp

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread Greg Schafer
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > The benefits of this is that, after it builds its stage 1 xgcc, even if > there are inconsistencies in the chapter 5 toolchain, gcc will always > find and use the correct binutils in /usr. Also it will build itself > using the same configuration the final product will h

Re: Use of words in Udev_update

2006-02-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
Richard A Downing wrote: The excellent page 7.4 on "Device and Module Handling on an LFS System" has a minor wording difficulty for me. Only minor (or am I missing a sarcasm-detection plugin)? The whole page needs rewriting following the removal of hotplug and advancements made in udev sinc

Re: bash-3.1 and --without-bash-malloc

2006-02-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jim Gifford wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: When bash-3.1 went into the book did anyone test whether or not '--without-bash-malloc' still causes the segfaults that the book claims is the reason we use the switch? Tried it in CLFS didn't work, the errors still happen, it caused a complete lock

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/7/06, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is a bold statement to make and doesn't belong here. > The whole world isn't poor you know. My comment didn't have a place here. Sorry about that. I'll remember to keep the personal stuff to myself next time. For the record, tho

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread William Harrington
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote: On 2/7/06, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here is my advice to those who think it takes too long... get 1GB to 2GB ram and build your sources in shared memory or get a faster machine. The American Way (TM) - There's no obstacle

BLFS and ACPI

2006-02-07 Thread Filip Bartmann
How it is in BLFS with ACPI support? When I want to get my computer to state S3, then computers go to this state. But when I want wake up PC, then PC starts with booting. If I use S1, then monitor, don't sleep. When I try on this computer Ubuntu, then it was all good. Filip Bartmann -- http://lin

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/7/06, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is my advice to those who think it takes too long... get 1GB to > 2GB ram and build your sources in shared memory or get a faster > machine. The American Way (TM) - There's no obstacle too big for purchasing power. -- http://linuxfr

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread William Harrington
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello All, In talking with Ryan Oliver, there seems to be one final thing that we can do to our current build which will help stabilize it completely: add 'make bootstrap' to the gcc build of chapter 6. The benefits of this is that, afte

Re: Bootstrapping GCC

2006-02-07 Thread George Boudreau
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Ryan Oliver wrote: I must admit I never really ever bothered doing a time comparison between the methods (the build takes as long as it takes). Would be interesting to get some figures... If we can get jhalfs set up to parse CLFS x86 -> x86, I can time the builds here.