We have had a trac beta up now for a couple of weeks. The time has now
come to implement it. The plan is to use it as a substitute for
Bugzilla and ViewCVS as well as to implement the wiki. The main web
site will remain unchanged.
To do this, we will need to disable adding new bugs and modifyin
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/30/06 19:25 CST:
> Where would the right place be? Since, as Dan said, we have a whole
> Stripping section later in the book, this would kinda be pointless
> unless we drop that section.
We are talking about Chapter 5 right? I looked and the -s flags are
on
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/30/06 19:22 CST:
> Excellent idea, because you ask some pretty stupid... Er. I mean,
> excellent idea! ;)
This must be FWD day.
I'll leave it to the imaginative to figure out what FWD is. :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Perhaps its not the right place, but passing the -s or --strip-all flag
> to ld seems to be an interesting educational example.
Where would the right place be? Since, as Dan said, we have a whole
Stripping section later in the book, this would kinda be pointless
unless we drop
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> On 1/29/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> So. Exepect a commit in ~ 5 minutes.
>>
>>
>> Anyway, since we're not passing -s anywhere else in the book, then it
>> shouldn't be passed here for consistency. Or, it should be added
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 1/29/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So. Exepect a commit in ~ 5 minutes.
Anyway, since we're not passing -s anywhere else in the book, then it
shouldn't be passed here for consistency. Or, it should be added to
everything and we can drop the Stripping s
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm issuing a standing 8 count. How many fingers am I holding up?
How did you get 23 fingers?
Maybe you could use one of those "Hang in there, kitty" posters right now.
Hehe. Um, no thanks. This email was good enough. ;)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l
On 1/30/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> *sigh* I suppose the right thing to do here is pick myself up and try
> again. But I'm getting pretty bruised. :/
I'm issuing a standing 8 count. How many fingers am I holding up?
Maybe you could use one of those "Hang in there, kitty" p
Dan Nicholson wrote:
The LDFLAGS="-s" won't hurt anything since it's the strip all symbols
input parameter for ld. From ld --help:
-s, --strip-all Strip all symbols
Oh, duh. Good catch, Dan. Since I started working with this I kept
seeing it and remembering it as the option fo
On 1/29/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So. Exepect a commit in ~ 5 minutes.
Sorry, one more nit, though this has to do with Binutils-Pass 1 & 2.
I didn't notice it until it was rendered today.
Currently, the make command on the rebuild has
make LDFLAGS="-s" LIB_PATH="/new/pa
Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> where is the LFS-svn ChangeLog gone?
Should be fixed on the next render. There was a closing tag missing. I
could swear I ran 'make validate'! :/ Must've done that and then
realized I didn't edit the changelog...
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> where is the LFS-svn ChangeLog gone?
good question...
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi all,
where is the LFS-svn ChangeLog gone?
regards
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> In the adjustment, though, he uses `gcc -dumpmachine`, though. This
> is probably wise since you don't know what MACHTYPE is from the
> host's bash. In fact, this might be a good idea for both
> adjustments. I don't know how reliable MACHTYPE is, but I'm
> speculating sin
14 matches
Mail list logo
