On 11/6/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 11/06/05 22:44 CST:
>
> > Is the uname patch really required in
> > the book? Is it really critical to apply that patch? If it is, why has
> > it never been submitted upstream?
>
> This was just discussed
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 11/06/05 22:44 CST:
> Is the uname patch really required in
> the book? Is it really critical to apply that patch? If it is, why has
> it never been submitted upstream?
This was just discussed a week or so ago, and the consensus was
that folks wanted it. As
On 11/6/05, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coreutils was just upgraded to 5.93 in the LFS book, but the uname patch
> for 5.93 is not in the patches download location.
Not exactly a response to your question. But your mail reminded me of
an observation I wanted to make. Is the uname patc
Coreutils was just upgraded to 5.93 in the LFS book, but the uname patch
for 5.93 is not in the patches download location.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello,
the UTF-8 LFS book has been updated. All the changes that happened to
the trunk have been incorporated, except for coreutils version update.
The reason is that the i18n patch doesn't exist for coreutils-5.92 yet,
and without it one cannot pass the LI18NUX2000 Level 1 testsuite (part
of LS
