On 11/6/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 11/06/05 22:44 CST: > > > Is the uname patch really required in > > the book? Is it really critical to apply that patch? If it is, why has > > it never been submitted upstream? > > This was just discussed a week or so ago, and the consensus was > that folks wanted it. As far as upstream, well .... >
I clicked on the Send button too early. I do know the answers to the questions. I meant to say that based on the answers to the questions, I don't think it is a patch that needs to be in the LFS book. It is the kind of patch that is ideal for the patches project. The line "Hello, major hack." in the patch does not make it very suitable for the offical book. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
