El Lunes, 25 de Abril de 2005 01:41, Anderson Lizardo escribió:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> The multiarch Makefile seems to ignore the CHUNK_QUIET=1 parameter so
> the cronjob which runs the render script always mails the output. Can
> this be fixed?
Oppss, removed accidentally in one of the big Makefile cha
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:51:19PM +0800, Tony Morgan wrote:
>
> Don't ask me why, but comiling a GNU/Linux system from scratch is really
> daunting and scarey - this reassurance of "Ok, you can delete [...] now"
> would really help first-timers.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing
Wanna see girls naked on your pc live?
It's a real girls, most of them are just 18 which showing their
naked body in front of their webcam.
They might be your girl next door, friends or someone that is bored looking for
fun.
Gu-arrantee unlimited access to view all girls at "NO Charge!"
Hard
Tony Morgan wrote:
> However, what's missing is a second explicit notice along the lines
> of "Ok - that [xxx] build directory we told you not to remove earlier
> - it's now safe to erase it. We won't be needing that particular
> build of [xxx] anymore".
In Section 5.8, right after the "Note" abou
I'm still following the LFS book at the moment, I'm yet to complete an
LFS installation...
I'm following the SVN-20050417, and my suggestion is in reference to ch
5.4 (binutils pass 1), 5.9 (Tcl) and probably a number of other times
this occurs throughout the book.
I've come to realise that, a
Peter Ennis wrote:
How about:
s/(see the Section 1.3, “Resources” section of this book)/(refer to
"Section 1.3. Resources" of this book)/
'section' is used only one time.
Perfect! :D
PS I'm glad to see you weren't offended by my 'accusing' you of poor
grammar - it was never intended to be an ins
