Tony Morgan wrote: > However, what's missing is a second explicit notice along the lines > of "Ok - that [xxx] build directory we told you not to remove earlier > - it's now safe to erase it. We won't be needing that particular > build of [xxx] anymore".
In Section 5.8, right after the "Note" about skipping the command if you don't have binutils: > Now that the adjusted linker is installed, the Binutils build and > source directories should be removed. And in Section 5.10, last sentence before the contents section: > The source directories of both Tcl and Expect can now be removed. ;-) (You do need to keep the binutils-pass2 directories around until chapter 6. But the re-adjusting-the-toolchain section also has a sentence somewhere that says to delete them.) Maybe these should be made to stand out a bit more, using the "Note" formatting?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
