Re: 6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Ryan . Oliver
Randy McMurchy wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 03/31/05 00:34 CST: > >> linux-pam 0.77 ( 0.78 barfed ) > >I would be interested in knowing what exactly went wrong with the >Linux-PAM-0.78 installation. Yeah, me too... didn't have time to debug at the time... Quite possibly due

Re: 6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 03/31/05 00:34 CST: > linux-pam 0.77 ( 0.78 barfed ) I would be interested in knowing what exactly went wrong with the Linux-PAM-0.78 installation. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release ver

Re: 6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Ryan . Oliver
Archaic wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:55:18PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: >> >> I mentioned this same thing at the beginning of this month. I >> have several systems running current SVN versions of LFS without >> any issues I can think of. > >FWIW, I have installed (and used constantly

test post

2005-03-30 Thread Archaic
Don't shoot me. I'm just the messenger. Shoot quadrata instead. ;) (BTW, this is a mail/news test) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-

MYSQL bootscript will not work with svn bootscripts

2005-03-30 Thread Nathan Coulson
mysql's bootscript uses killproc with no parameters, which breakes the check I have included. [which just prints out a useage message]. the LSB [what I was trying to make the functions compatible to], uses the killproc [options] progname [killsig] notation. The way killproc is "currently" writte

Re: 6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:55:18PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > I mentioned this same thing at the beginning of this month. I > have several systems running current SVN versions of LFS without > any issues I can think of. FWIW, I have installed (and used constantly) ssh, X, bind-utils, apache

Re: 6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Archaic wrote these words on 03/30/05 16:43 CST: > With the exception of the kernel changing every week, this book seems > rock solid. Add to that the 5 months since lfs-6 was release and it > seems it might be time to cut a testing branch? I mentioned this same thing at the beginning of this mont

6.1 release?

2005-03-30 Thread Archaic
With the exception of the kernel changing every week, this book seems rock solid. Add to that the 5 months since lfs-6 was release and it seems it might be time to cut a testing branch? Opinions? -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Sc

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:45:41 +0200, Matthias Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 > Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and > > >made a disaster. > > > > Let us know what the errors were so

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let us know what the errors were so we can fix them. 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions === line 39 === if [ -z "${COLUMNS}" ] then COLUMNS=$(stty size) COLUMNS=${COLUMNS##* } fi === This causes zsh-problems when $COLUMNS

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 > Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and > > >made a disaster. > > > > Let us know what the errors were so we can fix them. > > Ok, I'll do so, but it may take some time. Please don't

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and > >made a disaster. > > Let us know what the errors were so we can fix them. Ok, I'll do so, but it may take some time. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Joel Miller
Matthias Berndt wrote: Greetings! Wouldn't it make sense to change the SheBang in the bootscripts from '#!/bin/sh' to '#!/bin/bash' because the scripts are not bourne shell compatible? I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and made a disaster. Please tell us the kind of er

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Jim Gifford
Matthias Berndt wrote: Greetings! Wouldn't it make sense to change the SheBang in the bootscripts from '#!/bin/sh' to '#!/bin/bash' because the scripts are not bourne shell compatible? I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and made a disaster. ciao Matthias Berndt Let u

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:36:24PM +0200, Matthias Berndt wrote: > > Wouldn't it make sense to change the SheBang in the bootscripts from > '#!/bin/sh' to '#!/bin/bash' because the scripts are not bourne shell > compatible? I was under the impression they were made compatible. ?? -- Archaic Wa

Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
Greetings! Wouldn't it make sense to change the SheBang in the bootscripts from '#!/bin/sh' to '#!/bin/bash' because the scripts are not bourne shell compatible? I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and made a disaster. ciao Matthias Berndt -- http://linuxfromscratch.