Randy McMurchy wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 03/31/05 00:34 CST:
>
>> linux-pam 0.77 ( 0.78 barfed )
>
>I would be interested in knowing what exactly went wrong with the
>Linux-PAM-0.78 installation.
Yeah, me too... didn't have time to debug at the time...
Quite possibly due to mods I have done on my end to support
bi-arch... but things didn't look like they had changed that much
between 0.77 and 0.78 ...
Will report back when I know more ( to blfs-dev )
Best Regards
[R]
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
