Jeremy Utley wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
Would it be possible to
download an unstripped LFS 6.0 version of libc.a and continue?
I don't see why not, but IMHO, it's far easier to just build the Pass1's
dynamic instead of static - it sidesteps libc.a completely (uses libc.so
instead), and definat
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Because the problem is actually if libc.a has been stripped with
buggy binutils, removing the TLS information from the library. The
only resolution would be to completely recompile Glibc.
I see. It's glibc that get corrupted. Would it be possible to
dow
Robert Connolly wrote:
Could someone with glibc and unistd.h patched linux-libc-headers please try to
build either vsftpd or proftpd and tell me if it will run. Util-linux doesn't
seem able to utilize the change in the headers.
robert
I would, however I am on buisness till friday morning. That w
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Because the problem is actually if libc.a has been stripped with buggy
binutils, removing the TLS information from the library. The only
resolution would be to completely recompile Glibc.
I see. It's glibc that get corrupted. Would it be possible to download
an unstripped
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
What if binutils were just rebuilt using the same package, but leave
the libraries unstripped?
Because the problem is actually if libc.a has been stripped with buggy
binutils, removing the TLS information from the library. The only
resolution would be to completely recompile
Steve Crosby wrote:
"Robert R. Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Why is stripping the host binaries the issue?
1. There was a bug in binutils 2.15.92.0.1 and earler that caused the strip
command to drop TLS symbols from static libraries. This was fixed in
2.15.92.0.2
2. There was *also* a b
Steve Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> "Robert R. Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> news:d0lq7l$ht0$1 @belgarath.linuxfromscratch.org:
>
>>
>> Why is stripping the host binaries the issue?
>> My Febuary 22, 2005 rebuild of Gentoo 2004.3-unstable had absolutely
"Robert R. Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:d0lq7l$ht0$1
@belgarath.linuxfromscratch.org:
>
> Why is stripping the host binaries the issue?
> My Febuary 22, 2005 rebuild of Gentoo 2004.3-unstable had absolutely no
> issues with any of the LFS-BOOK-SVN-20050228-HTML chapter 5 packages
Randy McMurchy wrote:
When using an LFS-6.0 host, with stripped binaries, the last step
in the chapter 5 Binutils instructions (rebuilding the ld
subdirectory) in the current SVN book will fail.
This is a known issue.
Two things:
1. Shouldn't this be explained in BIG BOLD text somewhere in the
prer
Steve Crosby wrote these words on 03/07/05 23:09 CST:
> Bug 1061 created with suggested text (compiling binutils\gcc shared) - note
> that I haven't the experience with the toolchain to indicate if this is a
> "correct" fix, and since it's a toolchains issue, will need some serious
> brainpower
Hello Account #2762196,
Your application was approved. You are eligible for $400,000 with a 3.7 % rate.
Please confirm your information here:
http://mortgage-specialists.com/1/index/mal/Random
We look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
constantina carlean, Senior Account Manager
JCM Financi
11 matches
Mail list logo
