Steve Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> "Robert R. Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:d0lq7l$ht0$1 @belgarath.linuxfromscratch.org: > >> >> Why is stripping the host binaries the issue? >> My Febuary 22, 2005 rebuild of Gentoo 2004.3-unstable had absolutely >> no issues with any of the LFS-BOOK-SVN-20050228-HTML chapter 5 >> packages except flex, it would not compile so I am using flex-2.5.4a. >> >> the host toolchain is >> GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4 >> GNU CC version 3.4.3-20050110 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3.20050110, >> ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0, pie-8.7.7) >> binutils GNU ld version 2.15.92.0.2 20040927 >> > > There are 2 issues (note: I don't fully comprehend the issues, just > re- gurgitating and summarising various posts from mailing lists): > <snip> > > LFS 6.0 suffers from this issue, as it uses the broken strip (but not > the broken ld). When using LFS6.0 as a host to build LFS-SVN, which > has a fixed ld, it rightly complains and refuses to link. > thats a thinko - should read: > LFS 6.0 suffers from this issue, as it uses the broken strip (and > the broken ld). When using LFS6.0 as a host to build LFS-SVN, which > has a fixed ld, it rightly complains and refuses to link. -- - Steve Crosby -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
