downright shocking.
I propose to make it an official goal to carry no patches at all; everything
should be upstreamed or dropped. That is the only policy that makes any
sense at all.
Comments, opinions?
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev ma
The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iftop/Makefile | 4 ++--
package/network/utils/iftop/patches/0001-
t all for this old-style [prefix].
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
e it "introduces new problems". The problem is right here, nowhere else.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On 05/07/2016 07:17 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2016 15:16, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
>> The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
>> but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
>
> are you sure that ncurses
On 05/07/2016 12:01 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-05-07 11:43, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
Is there anything else that could pull in libncursesw?
Packages from feeds sometimes use libncursesw instead of libncurses. I
just did a size comparison:
110481 libncurses_5.9-3_mipsel_1004kc_dsp.ipk
125871
On 05/07/2016 12:46 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-05-07 12:40, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
On 05/07/2016 12:01 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
We should probably just move everything to libncursesw and drop
libncurses entirely.
Actually I'd gotten this wrong: libncursesw is an extra build opti
streaming your patch must clearly be the first choice. Did you even
try to upstream an ncurses preference in iftop? It's been in the OpenWrt
repo for 3.5 YEARS!
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iftop/Makefile | 4 ++--
package/network/utils/iftop/patches/0001-
ng to the iperf2 project -- either way the original needs to go.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On 05/10/2016 03:58 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I'd suggest switching the project to iperf2, keeping the package name
> and dropping the non-multi-threaded variant.
Ok, will do.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing li
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iperf/Makefile | 40 +++---
...et-report-next-time-in-single-thread-mode.patch | 14
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
package/network/utils/iperf/patches/001-set
sion needs _GNU_SOURCE
defined to build properly against musl. Various other obsolete build
options were also removed.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iperf/Makefile | 13 ++-
.../utils/iperf/patches/002-format-security.patch | 96 --
2 files
13 matches
Mail list logo
