On 05/05/2016 06:15 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > But I'd observe that it's easier for people to *add* this nonsense on > the client side of they really want it, than it is to *remove* it > again. You're basically penalising those who *do* set up their mail > clients optimally, for the benefit of those who can't be bothered to.
Exactly so. You can make a pretty good case that lede-dev should be a technical, developer-oriented mailing list with git patches, technical discussions, and severe frowning on HTML and top-posting. In such a list, there is no need at all for this old-style [prefix]. -- Bert Vermeulen b...@biot.com _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
