Dear,
Please cancel this patch
Since this was submitted:
- 4.9.27 already arrived
- Some other kernel patches have been submitted or got staged after this
patch was created
Logically, this one will now not apply anymore.
Koen
On 2017-04-28 15:17, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
- Refresh all pat
Hey,
You can also Reject your patch here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/
Specifically, this patch is:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/756400/
And [for reference] you can see all patches submitted by you [from
your email account]:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/?s
On 2017-05-08 09:36, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
Hey,
You can also Reject your patch here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/list/
Specifically, this patch is:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/756400/
And [for reference] you can see all patches submitted by you [from
your email account
- Refresh all patches
- Removed upstreamed
- Adapted 1
Compile tested on: bcm53xx, cns3xxx, imx6
Run tested on: cns3xxx & imx6
Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte
---
include/kernel-version.mk | 4 +-
.../802-usb-xhci-force-msi-renesas-xhci.patch | 2 +-
...stmmac-D
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we
would like to propose and have people vote on.
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for ope
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> *) mailing list
> - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
> - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
> unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this
> - import the user DB from the current openwrt a
John Crispin writes:
> Hi,
>
> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
> discussed
> the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to
> propose
> and have people vote on.
Great to hear progress is being made on this! I think the proposal l
2017-05-08 15:43 GMT+02:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen :
> John Crispin writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
>> discussed
>> the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to
>> propose
>> and have people vote on.
>
> Gre
Run the bridge_reset_primary function only after the member being removed
has been marked as not present.
This change prevents the bridge_reset_primary function from choosing the
member being removed as the new primary member.
Signed-off-by: Alex Oprea
---
bridge.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
> Op 8 mei 2017, om 15:19 heeft John Crispin het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Hi,
>
> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
> discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would
> like to propose and have people vote on.
Is a recording or
On 2017-05-08 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
John Crispin writes:
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed
the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose
and have people vote on.
Great to hear progress is be
On 08/05/17 15:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
*) mailing list
- ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
- announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this
- import the u
I think it is a great news that openwrt/lede governance is merging back
together. I was really worried. There is not that many of you that can
run a complex project like that.
>From my side what matters is to be able to take the last release and
build it from source for my use. I found lede 17 rel
Hi Christian,
>Hello,
On Saturday, May 06, 2017 11:24 PM Christian Lamparter wrote:
>On Friday, May 5, 2017 9:19:36 PM CEST Ram Chandra Jangir wrote:
> This change add nand boot support for IPQ40xx based
> AP-DK04.1-C1 board using ubi image, also add sysupgrage support for
> AP-DK04.1-C1 and
Hi,
Great seeing progress being made!
I read the proposal and think it's overall good but I think some things
should should have a slightly more direct approach.
Domain:
I might be misunderstanding here but why not reach out to gandi.net for
providing DNS servers instead of maintaining it by
Hi,
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote:
Trac:
Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just display
a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt?
There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the
years, either as comments, no
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote:
>
> > Trac:
> > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just
> > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt?
>
> There is a lot of "
The parameter specification missed that -s takes an argument.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels
---
package/utils/fritz-tools/src/fritz_tffs_read.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/utils/fritz-tools/src/fritz_tffs_read.c
b/package/utils/fritz-tools/sr
Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels
---
target/linux/lantiq/base-files/sbin/dsl_notify.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/sbin/dsl_notify.sh
b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/sbin/dsl_notify.sh
index 11ada92..8503ab4 100755
--- a/t
Glad to hear the merge is coming and that enough issues were resolved to
make this go forward. So ... I'll just throw my thoughts into the hopper.
> On 05/08/2017 09:19 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> *) branding
>
From a raw objective stand, OpenWrt has better market value as a brand.
Its longer
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Who among our resident young-timer
On Tue, 9 May 2017, A. Benz via Lede-dev wrote:
Likewise, OpenWRT while more recognizable than LEDE, is not worth as much as
people here paint it, and will only remain relevant as long as people keep
using it. Market/brand concept (in retail) doesn't really apply.
I'll point out that just las
I, too, look forward to putting energy where it matters.
However in reply to your point, how could it? When the first stable
release was made mere months ago.
The last patch that was submitted by QCA to add support for IPQ40XX, was
submitted to LEDE.
I simply hoped, that since there was a s
09.05.2017 00:44, Valentin Spreckels:
Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels
---
Thanks a lot for your patch. Would you please add a commit message which
describes the issue you are trying to fix. At the moment I fail to see
why this change is required.
I rather suspect that the whole pppoa in
On 2017-05-09 08:46, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> 09.05.2017 00:44, Valentin Spreckels:
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Spreckels
>>
>> ---
>
> Thanks a lot for your patch. Would you please add a commit message which
> describes the issue you are trying to fix. At the moment I fail to see
> why this cha
25 matches
Mail list logo
