2017-05-08 15:43 GMT+02:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk>:
> John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and 
>> discussed
>> the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to 
>> propose
>> and have people vote on.
>
> Great to hear progress is being made on this! I think the proposal looks
> reasonable, generally. A few comments / questions:
>
> - What will this mean for the community rules and the release schedule?
>   Will they continue from the current LEDE practices?
>
>> - update the landing page to have the same look & feel as the current openwrt
>> landing page
>
> Well, I like the L&F of lede-project.org better - but it's not something
> worth bikeshedding over, so meh, fine... ;)
>
>> *) trademark/sponsorship policy
>> - review/ack imres trademark policy
>> - review/ack jows sponsorship policy
>
> Links to these?
>
> -Toke

i think we can:

1. keep the OpenWRT brand (already voted),
2. integrate most of the stuff of the two projects (like the nice ToH
and the device-specific pages),
3. choose the LEDE L&F, provided that the majority cares about it (to be voted).

--
Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT
Information Technologies
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to