On 2016-08-04 08:11, James Finnie wrote:
> I've been chasing down some poor performance with my HH5A running LEDE
> (I've used r1142 - r1227 for testing). Most notable when using
> multiple interfaces, particularly the combination of 2.4G wireless
> with VDSL at high throughput (am lucky enough to
Signed-off-by: Florian Larysch
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk
b/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk
index 0a8115c..444d260 100644
--- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk
++
Signed-off-by: Florian Larysch
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk
b/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk
index 3f7a3ee..4809141 100644
--- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk
Hi,
I am quite desperate because I have a project going with these routers and I am
running really late.
Can anyone spare some time to help me, I am willing to pay an hourly rate for
the time if it will help.
This issue only occurs on ADSL. On VDSL performance is really good even using
PPPoE.
From: Sergey Sergeev
scp uls(like this
scp://adron@192.168.88.6:lede/lede-ar71xx-mikrotik-NAND-512b-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin)
is supported too. And you also can specify custom ssh
port(...8.88.6:22110:lede...)
Signed-off-by: Sergey Sergeev
---
package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/co
> Please test the latest version of my staging tree at
> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/nbd/staging.git;a=summary
I built an image with your r1251 from staging, it indeed has the
performance increase expected for SMP. I can't test the wifi ath9k
changes until this evening, though I understa
On 2016-08-04 15:40, James Finnie wrote:
>> Please test the latest version of my staging tree at
>> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/nbd/staging.git;a=summary
>
> I built an image with your r1251 from staging, it indeed has the
> performance increase expected for SMP. I can't test the wifi at
2016-08-04 12:40 GMT+02:00 Felix Fietkau :
> Please test the latest version of my staging tree at
> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/nbd/staging.git;a=summary
Hi Felix,
I've build an image for the reporter of FS#27 for testing and received
the following response:
> I upgraded existing HH5A w
Hi Donald,
Thanks for responding
The MTU seems fine.
This is the WAN link
pppoa-wan Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:2.25.173.155 P-t-P:172.16.11.136 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1
RX packets:94409 erro
Hi Daniel,
(I feel like a one-trick pony here, but...) Could this be bufferbloat? Maybe
not, but here's how to test:
Use the procedure for "A Quick Test for Bufferbloat" at
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Tests_for_Bufferbloat/#a-quick-test-for-bufferbloat
Watch to see if the
Hi Rich,
There is no traffic occurring when the latency is happening.
Also icmp requests do not have any latency and are consistently returning with
minimal latency.
It's only occurring in apps such as a ssh server. So whilst I was pinging and
getting good results, I ssh'd into the router and
I have been doing a little testing of the updated ath9k 2.4 GHz
support, based on the image I built from r1251 from your staging area.
The ath9k seems to be massively improved under high throughput, it
doesn't load the CPU anywhere near as much as before. The result of
this, plus the re-enabling
One more thing I forgot to mention is that router traffic is fine so if I dnat
to a host on the internal lan, performance is good.
So if it was bufferbloat it would affect all hosts
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf
Of Dani
13 matches
Mail list logo
