Ralph,
Am 21.05.2017 um 14:23 schrieb Ralph Sennhauser:
> If the seeded ubifs could be generalized to snapshot support ala btrfs
> that would change things a lot as it would enable uses far beyond just
> factory reset. No idea how feasible that is but might be worth
> considering instead.
I thoug
Hi Richard
On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:40:05 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Geert,
>
> Am 21.05.2017 um 10:37 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ralph Sennhauser
> > wrote:
> >> There is also the size consideration. Unless a seeded ubifs can get
> >> close to squa
Geert,
Am 21.05.2017 um 10:37 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ralph Sennhauser
> wrote:
>> There is also the size consideration. Unless a seeded ubifs can get
>> close to squashfs in terms of compression there would still be a
>> use-case for squashfs with an ubifs
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ralph Sennhauser
wrote:
> There is also the size consideration. Unless a seeded ubifs can get
> close to squashfs in terms of compression there would still be a
> use-case for squashfs with an ubifs overlay. My current root as ubifs
> instead of squashfs is 76.8% b
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 20 May 2017 21:57:36 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> Am 20.05.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Ralph Sennhauser:
> >>> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
> >>> overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
> >>> combination with U
Ralph,
Am 20.05.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Ralph Sennhauser:
>>> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
>>> overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
>>> combination with UBIFS is having a squashfs as lower and UBIFS as
>>> upper directory. Such that all chang
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:39:33 -0700
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/20/2017 09:12 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
> > overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
> > combination with UBIFS is
