On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ralph Sennhauser
<ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is also the size consideration. Unless a seeded ubifs can get
> close to squashfs in terms of compression there would still be a
> use-case for squashfs with an ubifs overlay. My current root as ubifs
> instead of squashfs is 76.8% bigger.
As seeded files are stored and kept unmodified, they could be stored in
compressed form?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
