On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>>
>> On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and
>>> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make andro
> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>
> On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote:
>> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and
>> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users
>> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/
On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote:
> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and
> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users
> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11).
Is this only a problem for Android users? I ran into a bu
On Friday, 10 February 2017 09:11:17 CET Dave Taht wrote:
> Hans, jow, blogic, everybody...
>
> I have been pulling lede-head stuff and starting to build lede again
> (for the first time in 3 years), but I'd given up on the ipv6
> issues[1].
>
> After reviewing odhcpd/procd/etc latest git commits
Hans, jow, blogic, everybody...
I have been pulling lede-head stuff and starting to build lede again
(for the first time in 3 years), but I'd given up on the ipv6
issues[1].
After reviewing odhcpd/procd/etc latest git commits today, I'm impressed.
My intent is to return to testing a few things t
