> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Stijn Tintel <st...@linux-ipv6.be> wrote: > > On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote: >> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and >> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users >> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11). > Is this only a problem for Android users? I ran into a bug a couple of > times where dnsmasq simply did not reply to queries sent to IPv6 > link-local addresses. I had this problem on my ERLs, it went away at > some point, then it came back, and while testing now, it seems to work > fine again. So unfortunately I have no idea why it happened, but that is > the only reason I configured a non-ULA DNS server on these devices. > > It wasn't really a problem on my Linux clients, but using Android with > IPv6 DNS servers that don't reply just isn't usable, even if the IPv4 > DNS servers work just fine. Each connection attempt had a ~12 second > delay or so. > > Stijn
Somewhat off-topic, but I’m trying to update the isc-dhcp scripts to work (they don’t). Is there documentation for what the UCI config for odhcpd looks like? I might be able to use the same configuration (or something pretty close to it) for synthesizing the /etc/dhcpd.conf file for ISC-DHCP. Thanks, -Philip _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
