Who needs telnet when nc is there ?
> Op 18 feb. 2018, om 19:25 heeft Philip Prindeville
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
>>> While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a teln
On 02/18/2018 10:21 PM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
On 2/18/2018 21:26, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin wrote:
On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
While sshd should be favoured over telne
On 2/18/2018 21:26, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
>>> While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the
>>> router is useful for connecting to
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
>> While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the
>> router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek
>
> sor
On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the
router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek
sorry for the late reply, it has been discussed over and over and the
decision
While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the
router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek
---
package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packag
