> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > > >> On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote: >> While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the >> router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.toma...@wertarbyte.de> > > sorry for the late reply, it has been discussed over and over and the > decision was made to not enable telnet by default. sorry ... > > John
Too bad. While it’s a liability for logging in, it’s a great tool for testing remote services like HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, JetDirect printers, etc. >> --- >> package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in >> b/package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in >> index 1977e7f..9e0efcf 100644 >> --- a/package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in >> +++ b/package/utils/busybox/Config-defaults.in >> @@ -2289,10 +2289,10 @@ config BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_TCPSVD >> default n >> config BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_TELNET >> bool >> - default n >> + default y >> config BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_FEATURE_TELNET_TTYPE >> bool >> - default n >> + default y >> config BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_FEATURE_TELNET_AUTOLOGIN >> bool >> default n > > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
