Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-26 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/26/2016 03:52 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2016-06-22 00:00, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear This lets one use the ath9k and ath10k driver instead of the built-in ath10k/ath9k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports). For ath10k, this should be a drop-in replacement

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-26 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2016-06-26 13:31, Ben Greear wrote: > On 06/26/2016 03:52 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2016-06-22 00:00, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: >>> From: Ben Greear >>> >>> This lets one use the ath9k and ath10k driver instead of the built-in >>> ath10k/ath9k driver from the upstream kernel (or backp

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-26 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2016-06-22 00:00, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear > > This lets one use the ath9k and ath10k driver instead of the built-in > ath10k/ath9k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports). > > For ath10k, this should be a drop-in replacement, as well as enabling > better CT fi

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-21 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/21/2016 03:15 PM, David Lang wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Ben Greear wrote: On 06/21/2016 03:04 PM, David Lang wrote: I'll point out that there is a lot of work being done on these drivers right now in terms of making significant changes to how they do buffering that in increasing networ

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-21 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/21/2016 03:04 PM, David Lang wrote: I'll point out that there is a lot of work being done on these drivers right now in terms of making significant changes to how they do buffering that in increasing network speed as well as reducing latency search the follwoing lists for [make-wifi-fast]

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-21 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Ben Greear wrote: On 06/21/2016 03:04 PM, David Lang wrote: I'll point out that there is a lot of work being done on these drivers right now in terms of making significant changes to how they do buffering that in increasing network speed as well as reducing latency searc

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-21 Thread David Lang
E-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver. From: Ben Greear This lets one use the ath9k and ath10k driver instead of the built-in ath10k/ath9k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports). For ath10k, this should be a drop-in replacement, as well as ena

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Support Candela-Tech ath10k and ath9k out-of-tree driver.

2016-06-21 Thread greearb
From: Ben Greear This lets one use the ath9k and ath10k driver instead of the built-in ath10k/ath9k driver from the upstream kernel (or backports). For ath10k, this should be a drop-in replacement, as well as enabling better CT firmware support. For ath9k, this enables some 5Mhz channel and 4.9