On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/21/2016 03:04 PM, David Lang wrote:
I'll point out that there is a lot of work being done on these drivers
right now in terms of making significant changes to how they do buffering
that in
increasing network speed as well as reducing latency
search the follwoing lists for [make-wifi-fast] to see the details and
benchmarks
make-wifi-f...@lists.bufferbloat.net,
ath9k-de...@venema.h4ckr.net,linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
Yes, and I will pull that stuff into my tree as it becomes stable and/or as I
have time.
It seems I have little chance to ever get my ath10k patches in the upsteam
kernel, so this is the
best I can think of for now.
It might be best to entirely decouple my ath10k from ath9k so folks can use
stock (LEDE) ath9k
but my ath10k. Maybe I simply had some typo in my first attempt at this.
I figure Felix will know better how to make this all work, so this patch
should probably
wait for him to comment on and/or fix.
One more thing that I didn't really see in the patch (but I may have skimmed
over it)
What is the difference/improvement between the stock driver and the Candela-Tech
driver? (i.e. as someone configuring LEDE, why would I pick your driver?)
David Lang
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
