Hello Piotr,
On 27/03/2017 11:22:05 CEST, Piotr Dymacz wrote:
> Hello Vittorio,
>
> On 26.03.2017 09:55, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote:
>> This router has the same hardware of TP-LINK TL-WR841N v11 (same
>> FCC ID, same TFTP image name...).
>>
>> The stock firmware web interface does not se
Hello,
On 29/03/2017 10:44:36 CEST, John Crispin wrote:
> On 26/03/17 10:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote:
>> -.phy_fixup = ar8327_phy_fixup,
>> +//.phy_fixup = ar8337_phy_fixup, // not needed at the moment
>> .set_mirror_regs = ar8327_set_mirror_regs,
>> .get_arl_entry =
Hello,
On 25/03/2017 23:36:03 CET, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> 25.03.2017 18:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam):
>> Backported from Code Aurora QSDK
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta
>
> Please describe in the commit message what kind of issues need a
> workaround. Yes, I noticed the comments
Hello Piotr,
On 25/03/2017 23:12:58 CET, Piotr Dymacz wrote:
> Hello Vittorio,
>
> On 25.03.2017 18:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote:
>> This router has the same hardware of TP-LINK TL-WR841N v11 (same
>> FCC ID, same TFTP image name...).
>>
>> The stock firmware web interface does not see
If you're wondering where the -ENFILE error comes from...
At first I thought it was obviously related to fs.file-max that
defaults to "just" 8192.
But it was not. It took me a while to figure out that the error
came from here instead...
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/li
Hi,
On 07/09/2016 08:11:03 CEST, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
+ dir_fd = open(dirname(path), O_RDONLY);
+ if (dir_fd) {
This should be dir_fd != -1, as -1 is returned when an error occurs in open().
+ fsync(dir_fd);
+ close(dir_
Hi,
As an opposite example, ar71xx 74Kc CPUs such as Atheros AR934x currently
run 34Kc (so 24Kc) code. Would a separate 74Kc subtarget make sense there?
On 22/08/2016 11:03:54 CEST, Jonas Gorski wrote:
But of course if benchmarks show that 74k won't reduce performance on
24k/34k/1004k, we can c
On 05/05/2016 21:30:56 CEST, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know if there are any plans for Chaos Calmer?
Will it become mantained by LEDE?
almost certinly not. But LEDE will create their own release to replace it.
Okay, it wou
Hello,
I'd like to know if there are any plans for Chaos Calmer?
Will it become mantained by LEDE?
Trunk introduces important changes, for example the switch from uClibc to
musl, so until everything's polished and ready for release I'd rather not
use trunk on "production" devices, like the main
Hi,
Even jow@openwrt and blogic@openwrt do not exist anymore as of now.
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
While for example juhosg@openwrt still exists.
I just hope this will not become another "ffmpeg vs libav"...
Cheers,
Vittorio
On 05/05/2016 02:00:29 CES
Hi,
On 04/05/2016 22:30:40 CEST, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
Hi all,
Very happy to see this project reboot happening. An acknowledgement of the
issues facing OpenWRT was long overdue. I'd like some clarity on some things
that aren't explicitly mentioned in the stated goals, however.
First off, is
Are you really thanking yourself for your patch here? ;)
Cheers,
Vittorio
On 04/05/2016 13:12:37 CEST, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Applied, thanks Rafal.
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede
12 matches
Mail list logo
