sion needs _GNU_SOURCE
defined to build properly against musl. Various other obsolete build
options were also removed.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iperf/Makefile | 13 ++-
.../utils/iperf/patches/002-format-security.patch | 96 --
2 files
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iperf/Makefile | 40 +++---
...et-report-next-time-in-single-thread-mode.patch | 14
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
package/network/utils/iperf/patches/001-set
On 05/10/2016 03:58 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I'd suggest switching the project to iperf2, keeping the package name
> and dropping the non-multi-threaded variant.
Ok, will do.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing li
ng to the iperf2 project -- either way the original needs to go.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iftop/Makefile | 4 ++--
package/network/utils/iftop/patches/0001-
streaming your patch must clearly be the first choice. Did you even
try to upstream an ncurses preference in iftop? It's been in the OpenWrt
repo for 3.5 YEARS!
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
On 05/07/2016 12:46 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-05-07 12:40, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
On 05/07/2016 12:01 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
We should probably just move everything to libncursesw and drop
libncurses entirely.
Actually I'd gotten this wrong: libncursesw is an extra build opti
On 05/07/2016 12:01 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-05-07 11:43, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
Is there anything else that could pull in libncursesw?
Packages from feeds sometimes use libncursesw instead of libncurses. I
just did a size comparison:
110481 libncurses_5.9-3_mipsel_1004kc_dsp.ipk
125871
On 05/07/2016 07:17 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2016 15:16, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
>> The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
>> but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
>
> are you sure that ncurses
e it "introduces new problems". The problem is right here, nowhere else.
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
t all for this old-style [prefix].
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space,
but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all.
Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen
---
package/network/utils/iftop/Makefile | 4 ++--
package/network/utils/iftop/patches/0001-
downright shocking.
I propose to make it an official goal to carry no patches at all; everything
should be upstreamed or dropped. That is the only policy that makes any
sense at all.
Comments, opinions?
--
Bert Vermeulen
b...@biot.com
___
Lede-dev ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
