On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote:
> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and
> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users
> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11).
Is this only a problem for Android users? I ran into a bu
On 2/11/17 2:00 PM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is triggered by the airtime fairness patches for ath9k being present.
>
> When this is disabled via:
>
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/airtime_flags
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/airtime_flags
>
> ..
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
This can't eliminate the /etc/rc.d/S* files as it only adds files, and it's not
as flexibile as adding a user or changing a password (as it would just let you
replace the /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow files, not modify them).
If you look for where the
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:33 PM, David Lang wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I was wondering if there’s an obvious place to install a hook that’s:
>>
>> (a) after all the packages have been installed;
>> (b) before the root filesystem image gets finalize
On 11 February 2017 at 17:00, Nick Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is triggered by the airtime fairness patches for ath9k being present.
>
> When this is disabled via:
>
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/airtime_flags
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/airtime_flags
>
rxkad will be build into af-rxrpc now and is of type boolean.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/netsupport.mk | 4 ++--
target/linux/generic/config-4.9| 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/net
Hi all,
This is triggered by the airtime fairness patches for ath9k being present.
When this is disabled via:
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/airtime_flags
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/airtime_flags
... these kernel panics do not occur.
I perhaps erroneously
On 2017-02-11 21:53, Mauro M. wrote:
> @Mathias
>
> On this router, that has already a WAN xDSL port, another WAN port is
> not a priority. If one wants to use the Red Ethernet as you intend to,
> one would use a different router that does not have an xDSL WAN.
>
> I do not want to test your st
@Mathias
On this router, that has already a WAN xDSL port, another WAN port is
not a priority. If one wants to use the Red Ethernet as you intend to,
one would use a different router that does not have an xDSL WAN.
I do not want to test your staging tree because your analysis is flawed,
you
11.02.2017 18:55, Mauro M.:
This proposed patch applies to BT Home Hub 5 Type A and:
1) it includes configuration for the Red Ethernet port as an additional
"dmz" interface (feature request FS#490)
NAK.
It's a WAN port and not a DMZ port. It should be used by default as WAN
port. If you need
Hello folks,
Am 09/08/2016 um 05:50 PM schrieb yanosz:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm thinking about hacking around with Linux network namespaces.
>
> Is it possible to assign a designated namespaces to a interface or link
> configuration in /etc/config/{network,wireless}?
Getting back to this:
IMHO I
This proposed patch applies to BT Home Hub 5 Type A and:
1) it includes configuration for the Red Ethernet port as an additional
"dmz" interface (feature request FS#490)
2) it fixes FS#390 providing the ability to associate port 5 to the main
switch VLAN.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
---
Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo
---
This patch fixes siwtch configuration for Newifi D1.I don't know why it used to
be so strange and unable to use.:(
BTW this patch should (and could) be applied to both the master branch and the
lede-17.01 branch.(I think I needn't send it twice,right?)
target/l
Hello,
The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
* lede: [LEDE-DEV,v1,2/3] apm821xx: add linux 4.9 apm821xx patches
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/726598/
- for: LEDE development
was: New
now: Accepted
* lede: [LEDE-DEV,v1,3/3] apm821xx: re
On Friday, 10 February 2017 09:11:17 CET Dave Taht wrote:
> Hans, jow, blogic, everybody...
>
> I have been pulling lede-head stuff and starting to build lede again
> (for the first time in 3 years), but I'd given up on the ipv6
> issues[1].
>
> After reviewing odhcpd/procd/etc latest git commits
Hello,
The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork:
* lede: [LEDE-DEV,v1,1/3] mac80211: make relay support depend on ATH_DEBUG
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/726597/
- for: LEDE development
was: New
now: Changes Requested
This email is a notificat
Hi,
> > huge disclaimer, can you not just use gplv2 ?
>
> Would the following header be acceptable?
>
> /*
> * TP-LINK TL-MR6400 board support
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Filip Moc
> *
> * LICENSE: 3-clause BSD
> */
Now when I think about it I guess it violates itself.
What about the fol
From: Rafał Miłecki
It matches recent project rename & uses directory that sholud be
persistent. Using /tmp/ could result in user having to setup JSONs after
every reboot.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
service.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/service.c b
28.01.2017 17:03, FUKAUMI Naoki:
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/image/mt7620.mk
b/target/linux/ramips/image/mt7620.mk
index 50eae2f..0728d93 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/image/mt7620.mk
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/image/mt7620.mk
@@ -465,3 +465,13 @@ define Device/kng_rc
zyimage -d 8
Hi John,
thank you for your response.
> > +++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
> ...
> bad ordering 3 < 6
Could you please explain what should I do to make this right?
Should I put it between "tl-wr941nd-v5)" and "archer-c5|\)"?
Or should I break all tl-mr34* from the rest just to ma
John Crispin wrote at Fri Feb 10 21:37:19 PST 2017:
> jow posted some instructions on how to overload parts of a packages
install template using one of buildroots built-in features, but i am failing
to find the mail in the archive.
You are likely referring to this:
http://lists.infradead.org/p
Am 11.02.2017 um 08:56 schrieb e9hack:
> Afterwards
> I do a 'make clean; make' for package e2fsprogs only and copy
> libext2fs.so.2.4 to the router. Now fcsk.ext4 can be
> execute. The size of the not working version of libext2fs.so.2.4 is 257168
> bytes and size of the correct version is
> 2729
22 matches
Mail list logo
