Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-11 Thread Aaron Z
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:56 PM, David Lang wrote: > Even low-end devices now include a USB port, and it's really easy to plugi > in an external USB drive that's >2TB. 3TB drives are now <$100 > > Now, if support for larger drives really does add a lot to the system > footprint, it should be optio

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-11 Thread David Lang
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: Hi Dave, I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which are really quite small a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-11 Thread Daniel Curran-Dickinson
Hi Dave, I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which are really quite small and low powered). 2 TB+ storage for example, or using l

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-11 Thread Lars Kruse
Hi Dave, > D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe > > I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5 > radios, if anything? I submitted a patch (that was accepted) for GPIO-based POE control - at least for Nanostations XM/XW and for TP-Link CP

[LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

2016-06-11 Thread Dave Taht
happy to see cake working today! thx all! In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10: A) We have flent's tc-iterate.c as a fast, lightweight means of polling fq_codel, pie, cake stats (as the shell in openwrt doesn't support a subsecond sleep) for openwrt. (However this package and code is in

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt] Poll on date for TR-069 & OpenWrt Face to face

2016-06-11 Thread Eric Schultz
Pasquale, Sure, no problem. I've added the week after to the poll. If you've already participated, please update with your dates for the week after. Reminder the poll is at: http://doodle.com/poll/f4zc8nseeb5s8s69 Thanks, Eric On 06/11/2016 12:35 PM, Pasquale Bombino wrote: > Hi All, > > Can we

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt] Poll on date for TR-069 & OpenWrt Face to face

2016-06-11 Thread Pasquale Bombino
Hi All, Can we also add the week after (first of July) as per our discussion during last week call ? Cheers, Pasquale -Original Message- From: openwrt-boun...@lists.prplfoundation.org [mailto:openwrt-boun...@lists.prplfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Eric Schultz Sent: sabato 11 giugno 20

[LEDE-DEV] WE3526 MULTI SSID CRASH

2016-06-11 Thread Denis Dorigo
Good day LEDE Reboot r595 lede-ramips-mt7621-zbt-wg3526-squashfs-sysupgrade After  adding new AP to Radio 1  (Multi SSID) you get  the following and router stops working: [   95.07] [ cut here ] [   95.07] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 22 at /home/buildbot/slave-lede-loc

[LEDE-DEV] Poll on date for TR-069 & OpenWrt Face to face

2016-06-11 Thread Eric Schultz
All, As requested, I've created a Doodle poll to help decide on the best dates for the TR-069 & OpenWrt Face to face. Please visit http://doodle.com/poll/f4zc8nseeb5s8s69 as soon as possible and select the days that work for you. Given the short time-constraints, it's likely best that we settle on

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Pass method paraneter to Lua notifications.

2016-06-11 Thread Iain Fraser
--- lua/ubus.c |5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lua/ubus.c b/lua/ubus.c index f59af90..be54d8d 100644 --- a/lua/ubus.c +++ b/lua/ubus.c @@ -770,11 +770,12 @@ ubus_sub_notify_handler(struct ubus_context *ctx, struct ubus_object *obj, lua_remove(st