[LEDE-DEV] lede mirror question

2016-05-30 Thread Simon Tretter
Hi list, I am currently rsyncing to create a lede mirror in Seattle according to the instructions available here: https://www.lede-project.org/downloads.html URL: http://mirror.mediaarchitectu.re/lede/ (still syncing) Under the headline "Infrastructure", you mention "trusted infrastructure" as a

[LEDE-DEV] ImageBuilder generated image does not create LED entries in /etc/config/system on first boot, why?

2016-05-30 Thread Laurent GUERBY
Hi, On a 841N v11 on current LEDE git with patch from (1) I'm trying to solve a puzzle: - when doing "make" the generated image in bin/targets/ar71xx/generic/lede-ar71xx-generic-tl-wr841-v11-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin does create on first boot /etc/config/system 'led' entries and so the LED work as

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel/mtd: Add support for Macronix mx25u25635f, used in Archer C2600 v1.1

2016-05-30 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 30 May 2016 at 11:52, Ash Benz wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ash Benz > --- > .../475-mtd-spi-nor-add-macronix-mx25u25635f.patch | 10 > ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-macronix-mx25u25635f.pat

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC] Enable kmod-ipt-debug by default

2016-05-30 Thread Alexander Couzens
On Mon, 30 May 2016 10:03:52 -0300 "Gabriel F.C. Mazzocato" wrote: > > From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > > > > The xt_TRACE kernel module can be used to debug the path of a > > network packet through the filter rules. Building it as a module by > > default (it is part of kmod-ipt-debug) would help

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread Ben Greear
On 05/26/2016 07:05 PM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:57 -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, and those that do not c

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread W. Michael Petullo
>> This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. >> The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, >> and those that do not can still config away the options they >> do not need. > Although I agree x86-64 is normally big, I'm not sure that it makes > sense to make

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC] Enable kmod-ipt-debug by default

2016-05-30 Thread Gabriel F.C. Mazzocato
> From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > > The xt_TRACE kernel module can be used to debug the path of a network > packet through the filter rules. Building it as a module by default (it > is part of kmod-ipt-debug) would help in some situations. > > Untested. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] package/util-linux: Fix libmount build under uClibc

2016-05-30 Thread John Crispin
On 30/05/2016 13:13, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:55 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:46 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >>> >>> This fixes util-linux building with uClibc. >>> Patch is taken as it is from Buildroot: >>> https://gi

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] package/util-linux: Fix libmount build under uClibc

2016-05-30 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hello, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:55 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:46 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > This fixes util-linux building with uClibc. > > Patch is taken as it is from Buildroot: > > https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/plain/package/util-linux/000

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

2016-05-30 Thread Delbar Jos
Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 05/27/2016 01:43 AM, Delbar Jos wrote: > > At Technicolor we have followed with great interest the recent proposals > to enhance OpenWrt with an open source solution for TR-069 remote > management. As one of the world's largest vendors of modems and routers > for carrier

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH procd 7/7] jail: don't CLONE_NEWUTS if we don't change hostname

2016-05-30 Thread John Crispin
On 30/05/2016 11:59, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Hi John, > > 2016-05-30 9:33 GMT+02:00 John Crispin : >> >> >> Hi Etienne, >> >> why dont we want to do that ? > > If you modify the hostname of the router you might want to propagate > it into the jail, it depends > > Please don't merge this pa

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH procd 7/7] jail: don't CLONE_NEWUTS if we don't change hostname

2016-05-30 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi John, 2016-05-30 9:33 GMT+02:00 John Crispin : > > > Hi Etienne, > > why dont we want to do that ? If you modify the hostname of the router you might want to propagate it into the jail, it depends Please don't merge this patch, i will improve it a bit: no -h => no CLONE_NEWUTS -h => CLONE_N

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

2016-05-30 Thread Delbar Jos
Felix Fietkau wrote: > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by > > Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. > > As a next step, we recommend to organize a workshop, at a practical > > location and time, where we

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 2/2] lantiq/image: move tplink specific image into own file

2016-05-30 Thread Alexander Couzens
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens --- target/linux/lantiq/image/Makefile | 45 +--- target/linux/lantiq/image/tp-link.mk | 45 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) create mode 100644 target/linux/lantiq/image/tp-

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 1/2] lantiq: unmacro tp-link boards

2016-05-30 Thread Alexander Couzens
even it's a little bit verbose, unmacrod board descriptions are much easier to read and to understand. Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens --- target/linux/lantiq/image/Makefile | 39 -- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel/mtd: Add support for Macronix mx25u25635f, used in Archer C2600 v1.1

2016-05-30 Thread Ash Benz
Signed-off-by: Ash Benz --- .../475-mtd-spi-nor-add-macronix-mx25u25635f.patch | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-macronix-mx25u25635f.patch diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-m

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] TR-069 for OpenWrt

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Curran-Dickinson
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 03:43 -0700, David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote: > > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by > > Felix, > > Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. As a next > > step, we recommend to organiz

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] TR-069 for OpenWrt

2016-05-30 Thread Delbar Jos
David Lang wrote: > I wasn't questioning why it's useful to support TR-069. The only part I was > questioning was the statement that OpenWRT needed work to make it > support remote management. > > There are already many tools to remotely manage/monitor OpenWRT > > But that's why I'm saying that

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH procd 7/7] jail: don't CLONE_NEWUTS if we don't change hostname

2016-05-30 Thread John Crispin
Hi Etienne, why dont we want to do that ? John On 30/05/2016 01:39, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote: > Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER > --- > jail/jail.c | 7 --- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/jail/jail.c b/jail/jail.c > index e425254..926e42c 1

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] Add some common packages for x86-64 target.

2016-05-30 Thread Daniel Curran-Dickinson
Hi, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:57 -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear > > This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. > The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, > and those that do not can still config away the options they > do not ne