Hi, On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:57 -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: > From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > > This should make x86-64 targets more useable out of the box. > The assumption is that most x86-64 users have adequate storage, > and those that do not can still config away the options they > do not need.
Although I agree x86-64 is normally big, I'm not sure that it makes sense to make the default install so different from other devices. One thing you might want to look is that patch series I've got as URFC's for doing things like preferring full vs. busybox and see if you could implement this as something that could be added via a single package install (or from imagebuilder baked into the image by specifying a single package). I'm not sure that making big/extra/different stuff part of snapshot and release images is a good idea (although including more drivers is different IMO, because that is about hardware support out of the box, rather than about different choices about what's in the OS (unlike full bzip2, getopt, different busybox options, etc)). I think the user should consciously decide they're looking for something other than a standard LEDE system. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
